History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Reosarevok (talk | contribs) |
m (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) to History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 22:03, 27 August 2016
Series
Me love! Especially I love the series proposal if it would mean that we would dump the volume number style guideline (which is used for keeping releases in a series together even if their names don't really imply it). //bnw
"Group" vs "Band"
Re: Entities, related concepts: what's the difference between "Group" and "Band?" Also, I think it'd be nice to have Collaboration, too. I'd also like to see a UPC and ISBN AR link for releases. ojnkpjg
- A "Group" is a more general term. A band is a group as is an orchestra, but an orchestra is not a band. Though these related concepts list was not meant to be exclusive, I just wanted to list some terms that are used yet and are related to the Artist entity and perhaps could lead to some discussion about more subtypes of this entity. I don't think we need an entity for UPC or ISBNs. In ReleaseDataSet I wrote another proposal that covers this. --Shepard