User:Reosarevok/Abbreviations vote: Difference between revisions
Reosarevok (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Keep things like "Pt." and "Vol.", if that's what the cover says. |
Keep things like "Pt." and "Vol.", if that's what the cover says. |
||
* --[[User:Reosarevok|Reosarevok]] ([[User talk:Reosarevok|talk]]) 19:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
* --[[User:Reosarevok|Reosarevok]] ([[User talk:Reosarevok|talk]]) 19:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
* [[User:JesseW|JesseW]] ([[User talk:JesseW|talk]]) 05:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Keep titles as per the release == |
== Keep titles as per the release == |
||
Keep the actual numbering and titling, even if their style changes through a series - series entities and series numbers already do all that's needed. |
Keep the actual numbering and titling, even if their style changes through a series - series entities and series numbers already do all that's needed. |
||
* [[User:JesseW|JesseW]] ([[User talk:JesseW|talk]]) 05:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 05:56, 23 January 2015
Hi! Since there seem to be opinions on all sides for the "should we keep expanding abbreviations" debate, I'm going to run a wider vote to see what people think. I'll take a look at the results at the end of January or start of February and take a decision with the info :)
Please choose one of the options below for each pair, and "vote" by signing under it (using the "your signature" icon). If you only have an opinion on one of the two issues, then feel free to vote just once! Feel free to add any comment with your vote, but please use either the mailing list or the forum for any discussion longer than just a vote comment.
Discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.style/19445 / http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?id=5469
There are two related, but independent, discussions here:
Expand all abbreviations
Keep all as is. "Pt." should be expanded to "Part", "Vol." should be expanded to "Volume" (or its language equivalents), etc.
Don't expand abbreviations
Keep things like "Pt." and "Vol.", if that's what the cover says.
- --Reosarevok (talk) 19:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- JesseW (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Standardise titles for series
Allow keeping series standardised if inconsistent. If most say "Volume" then use "Volume" for all (same for "Vol." or "Tome" or whatever). So, in a series labeled as "Vol. 1", "Vol. 2", "Vol. III", "Vol. 4", "Vol. III" could be changed to "Vol. 3" (or Volume 3, if you voted to expand abbreviations, anyway).
Keep titles as per the release
Keep the actual numbering and titling, even if their style changes through a series - series entities and series numbers already do all that's needed.