Search results

Page title matches

• Talk:Mash-up Relationship Type
  ...Mash-up|MashUp]] of all the tracks on a release, or a release which is a [[Mash-up|MashUp]] of many other tracks, using multiple [track-track] relationships. ...ew relationship type for "masher-upper", or use the [[Remixer Relationship Type]].
  2 KB (253 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010

Page text matches

• User:BrianSchweitzer/sandbox2
  * [[Talk:Amazon Relationship Type]] * [[Talk:Arranger Relationship Type]]
  2 KB (177 words) - 14:45, 20 March 2010
• Talk:Mash-up Relationship Type
  ...Mash-up|MashUp]] of all the tracks on a release, or a release which is a [[Mash-up|MashUp]] of many other tracks, using multiple [track-track] relationships. ...ew relationship type for "masher-upper", or use the [[Remixer Relationship Type]].
  2 KB (253 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
• User:BrianSchweitzer/sandbox5
  Given two songs, AAA and BBB, where we're looking for any relationship from BBB to AAA: :::* Yes: Use [[Samples Relationship Type]].
  2 KB (248 words) - 18:38, 21 March 2010
• History:Versus Style
  ...aborating''', credit as a collaboration using [[Collaboration Relationship Type]] form of [[Advanced Relationships]] (i.e. in accordance with [[Featuring A # In the third case, where '''the track is a [[Mash-up|mash-up]]''', use the mash-up artist as the [[Artist Name|artist name]], and put the two "versus" artist
  950 bytes (152 words) - 11:50, 26 May 2015
• Terminology
  ** [[Release Group/Type|Release Group type]] ** [[Label/Type|Label type]]
  7 KB (1,114 words) - 12:10, 8 September 2023
• User:Mihhkel/MusicBrainzi terminoloogia
  ** [[Artist/Type|Artist type]] — ? ** [[Label/Type|Label type]] — plaadifirma tegevusvaldkond?
  8 KB (1,159 words) - 18:29, 24 August 2012
• Proposal:Expanded Samples Relationship Type
  ...rely new track (i.e. it's not part of a mashup (see [[Mash-up Relationship Type|MashUpRelationshipType]])). ...tyle mailing list it can be argued that the current [[Samples Relationship Type|SamplesRelationshipType]] is an ineffective annotation to make - there are
  3 KB (457 words) - 05:40, 26 March 2010
• Style/Specific types of releases/Remixes and mashups
  ...release groups should use [[Release_Group/Type#Remix|the "Remix" secondary type]]. ...inked via a [[mb:relationship/7950be4d-13a3-48e7-906b-5af562e39544|remixer relationship]]. The remixed song’s title (including any [[Style/Titles#Extra_title_inf
  4 KB (714 words) - 18:50, 11 September 2023
• User:BarryPlatt
  =Track/Release Advanced Relationship Types= ...rianFreud]] has categorized the ARs into three types, defined as: <dl><dt>Type 1
  13 KB (1,816 words) - 14:55, 4 May 2014
• Talk:Mix-DJ Relationship Type
  ...es more sense to consider this a remix, and use the [[Remixer Relationship Type|RemixerRelationshipType]]. ([http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbr What is the difference between a mash-up and a DJ mix? Many mash-ups are essentially repeated cross-fades between t
  17 KB (2,750 words) - 04:37, 2 April 2009
• History:Next Generation Schema/Track Relationships Conversion
  ...e="background:red" | The NGS migration scripts either don't handle this AR type or do something different ! AR Type
  28 KB (3,945 words) - 18:33, 4 November 2011
• History:Remix Means Different Things
  ...that has an explicit reference to the original songs, this is called a '''mash-up'''. Often the two songs are referred to in the versus fashion (but be caref <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">There's no particular name for this, it's simply an original track th
  14 KB (2,417 words) - 22:48, 10 November 2011
• User:JimDeLaHunt/AdvancedRelationshipsCensus
  ...statistics of how many of which type are defined. ([[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]] does have a list, shorter and more aggregated th | album || album || 5 || is a mash-up of || 15
  21 KB (2,666 words) - 21:36, 30 October 2011
• Style/Relationships/URLs
  ===Multiple URLs for the same relationship type=== ...here is no technical limit to the number which can be added. However, some relationship types can potentially have hundreds of valid links and you should not try t
  7 KB (1,224 words) - 06:44, 2 April 2024
• History:Proposals/History
  | <h4 style='display: none'>RFC-204: Decommission Don't Make Relationship Clusters</h4> ...& Wikipage --> [[Don't_Make_Relationship_Clusters|Decommission Don't Make Relationship Clusters]]
  67 KB (8,499 words) - 16:06, 29 August 2016
• History:Track Grouping Proposal
  <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">''Update: Since this page is getting too long to edit, we are moving ...ionship. If you want to see the real mess, I propose you read [[Don't Make Relationship Clusters|DontMakeRelationshipClusters]] (and perhaps also [[Linking Differe
  22 KB (3,637 words) - 16:59, 28 August 2016
• History:Style Council/History
  ## [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s (basic advanced r ## [[Advanced Relationship Attribute|AdvancedRelationshipAttribute]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s (i
  13 KB (1,991 words) - 22:49, 1 February 2013
• History:Location Proposal
  ===Type=== <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Sometimes a "festival" is performed in a location of the other kinds,
  25 KB (4,218 words) - 18:49, 27 August 2016