Search results

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...vanced Relationship Types]] and [[Advanced Relationship Attribute|Advanced Relationship Attributes]] which are currently in the [[Proposals|proposal process]]. '''Do not propose new relationship types or attributes here.''' Instead, you should follow the [[Proposals|pro
    48 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:23, 26 May 2015
  • This relationship doesn't allow [release-track] or [track-release] [[Entity Pair|EntityPairs] ...ew relationship type for "masher-upper", or use the [[Remixer Relationship Type]].
    2 KB (253 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
  • ...for solo artists, please check it out: [[Supporting Musician Relationship Type|SupportingMusicianRelationshipType]]
    738 bytes (120 words) - 08:45, 15 March 2009
  • This describes any type of speech done by artists that cannot be classified as singing, rapping, re ...tor Relationship Type|NarratorRelationshipType]] and [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]] as subtypes. Use those last two subtypes instead o
    2 KB (297 words) - 06:21, 28 August 2016
  • ...udiobooks, which are read by a reader. For those use [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]]. ...ormanceRelationshipClass]]. It is a special case of [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].
    2 KB (291 words) - 21:01, 27 August 2016
  • ...are normally spoken by others. For a narrator use [[Narrator Relationship Type]]. ...mance Relationship Class]]. It is a special case of [[Speaker Relationship Type]].
    2 KB (299 words) - 13:59, 28 August 2016
  • == [[Advanced Moderation]] == * [[Advanced Relationship Family]]
    15 KB (1,776 words) - 17:24, 3 October 2011
  • ...nt Relationship Attribute|InstrumentRelationshipAttribute]] or any that is proposed here. ...onship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]] as subtypes to [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].
    5 KB (709 words) - 19:18, 27 August 2016
  • ...ategories do we need, are they good the way they are? Which ones should be proposed in [[Wiki Categories]]? == Invalid Relationship Family Categories ==
    8 KB (1,017 words) - 16:03, 26 May 2015
  • ...ationRelationshipType]]. This is now an [[Proposals|Advanced Relationship Type Proposal]]. ...e added this subcatagory to my proposed [[Supporting Musician Relationship Type|SupportingMusicianRelationshipType]]. This proposal aimed at artists who pl
    3 KB (498 words) - 18:37, 21 October 2011
  • ...anslated lyrics to the original work, use the [[Other Version Relationship Type]] with the ''translated'' attribute. ...ather than the lyrics, has been translated, then [[Librettist Relationship Type]], with the ''translated'' attribute, should be used.
    3 KB (418 words) - 21:26, 3 May 2014
  • ...:Proposal]] -- Pages that deal with proposals covering anything other than advanced relationships or [[Style Guideline]]. ...:Failed Proposal]] -- Pages that deal with any failed proposals, including advanced relationships and [[Style Guideline]].
    5 KB (676 words) - 16:22, 26 August 2016
  • If an [[Advanced Relationship|AdvancedRelationship]] is changed, none of the end-points is updated. ==Proposed New Update Rules==
    6 KB (916 words) - 21:08, 16 April 2009
  • This relationship is used to link an [[MusicBrainz Entity|entity]] to the [[Artist|artist]] w * This advanced relationship represents the "producer" credit for a work, when it is used to indicate th
    1 KB (196 words) - 19:18, 3 May 2014
  • =Artist Type: Project= This proposal describes a proposed new [[Artist Type|ArtistType]] "Project". This is an open [[Style Issue|StyleIssue]] (see the
    4 KB (609 words) - 14:57, 28 August 2016
  • # [[Simple Advanced Relationships Interface#goals|Goals of this proposal]] # [[Simple Advanced Relationships Interface#display|Display of relationships]]
    19 KB (3,132 words) - 01:41, 11 November 2011
  • ...ship''' which is as accurate as MusicBrainz allows, and indicate what that relationship exactly represents in the "Sub Optimal Credits" section. If it is not possi ...SubOptimalCredits%22+OR+%22Sub+Optimal+Credits%22&type=annotation&limit=25&advanced=1 Here] you can see examples of annotations that include it, like:
    2 KB (250 words) - 12:28, 24 September 2018
  • <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">[[Image:Attention.png]] '''Status: In limbo for 14 months now (2005-0 ...data and thus are expensive to load for both the database and the users. [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedRelationships]], [[Artist Annotation|ArtistAnnotation
    10 KB (1,491 words) - 19:58, 25 October 2011
  • ...sal]]|{{#if:{{{ar|}}}|[[Proposals#Advanced_Relationship_Proposals|advanced relationship proposal]]|[[Proposals#Other_Proposals|proposal]]}}}} and is '''not officia ...tegory:Proposed_Style]]|}}{{#if:{{{ar|}}}|[[Category:Proposed Relationship Type]]|}}</includeonly>
    2 KB (308 words) - 03:55, 6 June 2015
  • ...rited (except [[rt:ca8d3642-ce5f-49f8-91f2-125d72524e6a|Parts Relationship Type]], that would be too recursive). # Adding a new page [[Work/Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees]], with the text on the main page
    14 KB (2,115 words) - 22:27, 28 August 2016
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)