Difference between revisions of "Advanced Relationship Type Proposal"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
(CforD, taking away other categories. This page is dead. Moving the three semi-alive ideas over to the talk page at Proposals)
(Redirecting to Proposals)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DeletedHeader}}
+
#REDIRECT [[:Proposals]]
 
 
=Proposals of Additions or Changes to Advanced Relationship Types=
 
 
 
[[Image:Attention.png]] '''This page is superseded by [[Proposed Advanced Relationship Type|ProposedAdvancedRelationshipType]].'''
 
 
 
Initially this page was designed to collect all additions and changes that need to be done to the initial set of [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s. Unfortunately this page has become an unmaintainable [[Too Long List|TooLongList]] in which things get [[Lost In List|LostInList]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s. Additionally, the [[Style Council|StyleCouncil]] really needs a tracker to be able to keep an overview of all [[Open Style Issue|OpenStyleIssue]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s and assign them priorities. Lastly, this page has a [[Bad WikiName|BadWikiName]]. The correct one being [[Proposed Advanced Relationship Type|ProposedAdvancedRelationshipType]] (to fit in with [[Proposed Style Guideline|ProposedStyleGuideline]]).
 
 
 
'''Therefore''' this page is slowly going to die. The new page is [[Proposed Advanced Relationship Type|ProposedAdvancedRelationshipType]]. Anyone who has submitted an issue here and is interested in it being implemented should create a (preferably well named) wiki page for this issue and give it the  <code><nowiki>CategoryProposedAdvancedRelationshipType</nowiki></code>. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]]
 
 
 
So this page is a [[Candidate For Deletion|CandidateForDeletion]] and should be deleted once the remaining proposals here are migrated - or removed if outdated - to standalone wiki pages. -- [[User:murdos|murdos]] 12:40, 04 June 2007 (UTC)
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Where are we now? I don't see anything really worth it (or not already implemented) in there (except Wolfsong last suggestion that I may push). So, is this worth History, or rather [[Deleted Page|DeletedPage]]? -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 09:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 
</ul>
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
 
 
 
And here follows the [[Too Long List|TooLongList]]:
 
 
 
 
 
 
[[Relationship Editor|RelationshipEditor]]s are able to change relationship types or add new ones. but for this to happen you will need consensus on first the [[Users Mailing List|UsersMailingList]] and then the [[Style Mailing List|StyleMailingList]], and an [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]] page that describes the new relationship in all details.
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
 
==Inconsistent Link directions==
 
 
 
(by [[User:Dupuy|Dupuy]])  There's some general inconsistency in our link types about the directionality of 1-N relations:
 
 
 
artist-artist:
 
* '''1-N''' X "is the legal name of" Y, Z, A, ...
 
* '''2-N''' X "is the parent of" Y, Z, A, ...
 
 
 
album-album:
 
* '''1-N''' X "is the earliest release of" Y, Z, A, ...
 
* '' but'' '''N-1''' X (and Y?) "is a remaster of" A ("always point to earliest")
 
 
 
track-track:
 
* '''1-N''' X "is the earliest release of" Y, Z, A, ...
 
* '''1-N''' X "is the earliest version of" Y, Z, A, ...
 
* ''but'' '''N-1''' X (and Y?) "is a remaster of" A ("always point to earliest")
 
* '''N-1''' X (and Y?) "is a cover of" A ("always point to earliest")
 
 
 
Whatever we decide to do with the is-person relationship, we need to make these consistent...
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I'm not sure to understand the issue here: the current behavior - as of mid 2007 - seems satisfactory. -- [[User:murdos|murdos]] 12:40, 04 June 2007 (UTC)
 
</ul>
 
 
 
 
 
</ul>
 
 
 
[[Category:Candidate for Deletion]]
 

Revision as of 19:59, 1 March 2010

Redirect to: