History:Advanced Entity: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(discussion (Imported from MoinMoin))
 
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page was a collective proposal for new entities that had not yet been implemented, their behaviour and how to present them. Many of the ideas here had since been implemented, as of March 2010. Those which had not been, and were not yet planned (the NGS release), have been split off to [[Advanced Entity (Post-NGS)]] for future discussion/development.
=New Entities Proposal=


See [[Data Elements For Advanced Relationships|DataElementsForAdvancedRelationships]] for an older proposal.
'''Status:''' [[Image:Attention.png]] ''This page is a collective proposal for new entities that have not yet been implemented, their behaviour and how to present them.''


==Idea==
==Idea==
Line 16: Line 16:


The following entities with the described behaviour are proposed:
The following entities with the described behaviour are proposed:
* Label For record labels, subdivisions of labels and distributors
* Label
** field: [[Label Code|LabelCode]]
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">For record labels, subdivisions of labels and distributors
** AR to URL possible (label website (use "official website"?), Discogs entry, Wikipedia, discography site)
* field: [[Label Code|LabelCode]]
** AR to Artist ("is/was signed to from ... to ...")
* AR to URL possible (label website (use "official website"?), Discogs entry, Wikipedia, discography site)
* AR to Artist ("is/was signed to from ... to ...")
** AR to Label ("is sub-division of", "is distributor of"?)
** album listing with all albums which have the id of this label in a release
* AR to Series
** "View Mods" for related edits
* AR to Label ("is sub-division of", "is distributor of"?)

* album listing with all albums which have the id of this label in a release
** [[Album Group|AlbumGroup]]s These would be called differently depending the proposal, so I just list the proposals here:
* "View Mods" for related edits
*** [[Release Groups|ReleaseGroups]] -- This was written before [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedRelationships]] and therefore is conceived as a new [[Core Entity|CoreEntity]], but should not be one, would we implement this now.
</ul>
*** [[Release Handling Philosophy|ReleaseHandlingPhilosophy]] -- This proposal ''could'' be implemented without an additional entity, but an explicit album group would not really hurt.
* Series
Additionally one could think of different types of [[Album Group|AlbumGroup]]s like:
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">For compilation series
*** [[Release Group|ReleaseGroup]]/[[Edition Group|EditionGroup]] for different variants of one idea of an album
* examples: [http://musicbrainz.org/newsearch.html?limit=0&table=album&search=caf%C3%A9+del+mar Café del Mar], [http://musicbrainz.org/newsearch.html?limit=0&table=album&search=Ministry+of+Sound Ministry of Sound], [http://musicbrainz.org/newsearch.html?limit=0&table=album&search=kontor Kontor], [http://musicbrainz.org/newsearch.html?limit=0&table=album&search=hed+kandi Hed Kandi], ...
One [[Album Entity|AlbumEntity]] could be member of several groups - like Apocalyptica's "Cult: Special Edition (disc 1)" is in the same [[Edition Group|EditionGroup]] like the original "Cult" release but also in a [[Box Set|BoxSet]] together with "Cult: Special Edition (disc 2)" (but that could lead to multi-inheritance problems if you also want to use an inheritance mechanism like for [[Artist Group|ArtistGroup]]s). And you have to differentiate between a group of albums representing the same abstract album idea and groups of albums representing the same recording (important for linking recording information to the group).
* AR to URL possible (series website (use "official website"?), Wikipedia, discography site)
** [[Track Group|TrackGroup]]s Track groups would be the equivalent to the abstract idea of a '''Song''' while the '''Track''' entity stores data for one version/release of a track (which perhaps still could be used for several albums - so one Track entity could be on an album and a compilation).
* lists all albums belonging to this series. Linkage through AR or through album attribute?
*** Easier to link covers, participating artist infos and so on
* "View Mods" for related edits
Like for albums you have to separate between groups of tracks representing the same abstract song (of one artist!) and groups of tracks representing the same recording of a song.
</ul>
For new more detailed proposals for such groups see [[Album Rework|AlbumRework]] and [[Track Grouping|TrackGrouping]].
* Album Groups
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">These would be called differently depending the proposal, so I just list the proposals here:
* [[Release Groups|ReleaseGroups]] -- This was written before [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedRelationships]] and therefore is conceived as a new [[Core Entity|CoreEntity]], but should not be one, would we implement this now.
* [[Album Handling Philosophy|AlbumHandlingPhilosophy]] -- This proposal ''could'' be implemented without an additional entity, but an explicit album group would not really hurt. Additionally one could think of different types of [[Album Groups|AlbumGroups]] like:
* [[Release Group/Edition Group|ReleaseGroup/EditionGroup]] for different variants of one idea of an album
* [[Box Set|BoxSet]] for different albums belonging to one set
</ul>
* Track Groups
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Another "meta entity". If you think of albums as an abstract idea then album groups would represent this and '''Album''' entities would store the actual release data. The same can be applied for tracks: track groups would be the equivalent to the abstract idea of a '''Song''' while the '''Track''' entity stores data for one version/release of a track (which perhaps still could be used for several albums - so one Track entity could be on an album and a compilation).
* Easier to link covers, participating artist infos and so on
</ul>
* Studio
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">For recording studios
* AR to Album/Track ("has [instrument] recordings from ... to ... in")
</ul>


==Description==
==Description==
Line 55: Line 41:
Label entities could then be used in extended release infos of albums. Both labels and series help to keep an overview of the related releases and the related mods.
Label entities could then be used in extended release infos of albums. Both labels and series help to keep an overview of the related releases and the related mods.


Open question: link albums belonging to a series to the Series entity instead of [[Various Artists|VariousArtists]]? Or better leave VA as the artist because a Series entity is not an Artist entity and this could cause implementation problems? So better link it *additionally* to the Series?
Open question: link albums belonging to a series to the Series entity instead of [[Various Artists|VariousArtists]]? Or better leave VA as the artist because a Series entity is not an Artist entity and this could cause implementation problems? So better link it *additionally* to the Series?

==Discussion==

Me love! Especially I love the series proposal if it would mean that we would dump the volume number style guideline (which is used for keeping releases in a series together even if their names don't really imply it). //[[User:bnw|bnw]]

I'm not too sure of the new name of this page. Is this really about Advanced Entities? As I understood it it was just a suggestion for a few new 'normal' entrities. //[[User:bnw|bnw]]

Re: Entities, related concepts: what's the difference between "Group" and "Band?" Also, I think it'd be nice to have Collaboration, too. I'd also like to see a UPC and ISBN AR link for releases. [[User:ojnkpjg|ojnkpjg]]
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">A "Group" is a more general term. A band is a group as is an orchestra, but an orchestra is not a band. Though these related concepts list was not meant to be exclusive, I just wanted to list some terms that are used yet and are related to the Artist entity and perhaps could lead to some discussion about more subtypes of this entity. I don't think we need an entity for UPC or ISBNs. In [[Release Data Set|ReleaseDataSet]] I wrote another proposal that covers this. --[[User:Shepard|Shepard]]
</ul>

----| Original author: [[User:Shepard|Shepard]]


[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] [[Category:Discussion]] [[Category:Development]] [[Category:Proposal]]
[[Category:History]] [[Category:Development]]

Latest revision as of 07:58, 28 September 2011

This page was a collective proposal for new entities that had not yet been implemented, their behaviour and how to present them. Many of the ideas here had since been implemented, as of March 2010. Those which had not been, and were not yet planned (the NGS release), have been split off to Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) for future discussion/development.

See DataElementsForAdvancedRelationships for an older proposal.

Idea

At the moment we have the following CoreEntities:

  • Album
  • Track

We already have the following AdvancedEntity:

  • URL

The following entities with the described behaviour are proposed:

  • Label For record labels, subdivisions of labels and distributors
    • field: LabelCode
    • AR to URL possible (label website (use "official website"?), Discogs entry, Wikipedia, discography site)
    • AR to Artist ("is/was signed to from ... to ...")
    • AR to Label ("is sub-division of", "is distributor of"?)
    • album listing with all albums which have the id of this label in a release
    • "View Mods" for related edits
    • AlbumGroups These would be called differently depending the proposal, so I just list the proposals here:

Additionally one could think of different types of AlbumGroups like:

One AlbumEntity could be member of several groups - like Apocalyptica's "Cult: Special Edition (disc 1)" is in the same EditionGroup like the original "Cult" release but also in a BoxSet together with "Cult: Special Edition (disc 2)" (but that could lead to multi-inheritance problems if you also want to use an inheritance mechanism like for ArtistGroups). And you have to differentiate between a group of albums representing the same abstract album idea and groups of albums representing the same recording (important for linking recording information to the group).

    • TrackGroups Track groups would be the equivalent to the abstract idea of a Song while the Track entity stores data for one version/release of a track (which perhaps still could be used for several albums - so one Track entity could be on an album and a compilation).
      • Easier to link covers, participating artist infos and so on

Like for albums you have to separate between groups of tracks representing the same abstract song (of one artist!) and groups of tracks representing the same recording of a song. For new more detailed proposals for such groups see AlbumRework and TrackGrouping.

Description

(More detailed description missing...)

Label entities could then be used in extended release infos of albums. Both labels and series help to keep an overview of the related releases and the related mods.

Open question: link albums belonging to a series to the Series entity instead of VariousArtists? Or better leave VA as the artist because a Series entity is not an Artist entity and this could cause implementation problems? So better link it *additionally* to the Series?