History:News Coverage Relationship Type Proposal: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(Further limiting links, in hopes of allowing this to pass :))
Line 52: Line 52:
* To be a good target for this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]], the news coverage being linked should be sufficiently comprehensive that it has its own headline. The [[MusicBrainz Entity|entity]] being linked should be prominently, if not solely, featured within the article.
* To be a good target for this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]], the news coverage being linked should be sufficiently comprehensive that it has its own headline. The [[MusicBrainz Entity|entity]] being linked should be prominently, if not solely, featured within the article.


* For news coverage which is from a distribution source, such as the Associated Press, links to the same story which are closer to the source are preferred; a link to the original AP story would be preferred over the same story at The Washington Post, and a link to the story at The Washington Post would be preferred over a link to the same story in a local, small-circulation newspaper.
* For news coverage which is from a distribution source, such as the Associated Press, links to an identical story which are closer to the source are preferred; a link to the original AP story would be preferred over the identical story at The Washington Post, and a link to the story at The Washington Post would be preferred over a link to the identical story in a local, small-circulation newspaper.

* When the above is not applicable, if a news story has already been linked at one source, there is no need to link to the same general news coverage at a second source.

* Permanent URLs, when available, are much preferred.


* General purpose sites, general purpose blogs, and fan sites properly belong under various other [[:Category:External Information Relationship Class|relationship types]].
* General purpose sites, general purpose blogs, and fan sites properly belong under various other [[:Category:External Information Relationship Class|relationship types]].

Revision as of 22:57, 15 March 2010


Status: This page describes an active advanced relationship proposal and is not official.



Proposal number: RFC-68
Champion: BrianFreud (was ruaok)
Current status: RFC

RFC

Trac ticket # 5636

Template:Relationship