History:Object Model: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(linebreak (Imported from MoinMoin))
(lots of typos, a little cleanup (Imported from MoinMoin))
Line 46: Line 46:
</ul>
</ul>
** [[Object Model/Album Object|/AlbumObject]]
** [[Object Model/Album Object|/AlbumObject]]
** [[Object Model/Release Object|/ReleaseObject]] (or maybe better [[Object Model/Box Object|/BoxObject]]?)
** [[Object Model/Release Object|/ReleaseObject]]
*** [[Object Model/Release Event Object|/ReleaseEventObject]] (OMG what a terrible name)
*** [[Object Model/Release Event Object|/ReleaseEventObject]]


** [[Object Model/Medium Object|/MediumObject]]
** [[Object Model/Medium Object|/MediumObject]]
Line 58: Line 58:
* [[Object Model/Song Object|/SongObject]] (not part of the [[Next Generation Schema|NextGenerationSchema]])
* [[Object Model/Song Object|/SongObject]] (not part of the [[Next Generation Schema|NextGenerationSchema]])
* [[Object Model/Composition Object|/CompositionObject]]
* [[Object Model/Composition Object|/CompositionObject]]
* [[Object Model/Performance Object|/PerformanceObject]] (should be renamed to [[Object Model/Recording Object|/RecordingObject]])
* [[Object Model/Recording Object|/RecordingObject]]
* [[Object Model/Mix Object|/MixObject]]
* [[Object Model/Mix Object|/MixObject]]
* [[Object Model/Master Object|/MasterObject]]
* [[Object Model/Master Object|/MasterObject]]
Line 65: Line 65:
* [[Object Model/Track Object|/TrackObject]] (yes, that one is in both groups)
* [[Object Model/Track Object|/TrackObject]] (yes, that one is in both groups)
</ul>
</ul>
* The "pins" (these are not included in the graphic yes, sorry):
* The "pins" (these are not included in the graphic yet, sorry):
** [[Object Model/Release Title Object|/ReleaseTitleObject]] (in between [[Object Model/Release Object|/ReleaseObject]] and [[Object Model/Release Artist Object|/ReleaseArtistObject]])
** [[Object Model/Release Title Object|/ReleaseTitleObject]] (inbetween [[Object Model/Release Object|/ReleaseObject]] and [[Object Model/Release Artist Object|/ReleaseArtistObject]])
** [[Object Model/Medium Title Object|/MediumTitleObject]] (off the [[Object Model/Medium Object|/MediumObject]])
** [[Object Model/Medium Title Object|/MediumTitleObject]] (of the [[Object Model/Medium Object|/MediumObject]])
** [[Object Model/Track Title Object|/TrackTitleObject]] (in betwen [[Object Model/Track Object|/TrackObject]] and [[Object Model/Release Artist Object|/ReleaseArtistObject]])
** [[Object Model/Track Title Object|/TrackTitleObject]] (inbetween [[Object Model/Track Object|/TrackObject]] and [[Object Model/Release Artist Object|/ReleaseArtistObject]])
** and aditinally
** and additionally
*** [[Object Model/Uber Title Object|/UberTitleObject]] and
*** [[Object Model/Uber Title Object|/UberTitleObject]] and
*** [[Sub Title Object|SubTitleObject]]
*** [[Object Model/Sub Title Object|/SubTitleObject]]


The following graphic describes the ObjectModel as refined on the summit (code-named "[[Nadelnder Bambus|NadelnderBambus]]"). Note that the names have changed and might change again. Sorry for that:
The following graphic describes the ObjectModel as refined on the summit (code-named "[[Nadelnder Bambus|NadelnderBambus]]"). Note that the names have changed and might change again. Sorry for that:
Line 81: Line 81:
==Examples==
==Examples==


Now that we have completed a first stab at the objects, we need to check whether they actually fit the reality. Big thatnks to everybody who contributed to this list in the [http://www.nabble.com/Next-Generation-Database-Schema-t614803c2885.html#a1641780 Next Generation Database Schema thread] on the [[Users Mailing List|UsersMailingList]].
Now that we have completed a first stab at the objects, we need to check whether they actually fit the reality. Big thanks to everybody who contributed to this list in the [http://www.nabble.com/Next-Generation-Database-Schema-t614803c2885.html#a1641780 Next Generation Database Schema thread] on the [[Users Mailing List|UsersMailingList]].
# [[Object Model/Fela ITT Example|/FelaITTExample]], showing an release that is a merge of two previously released releases, and a track that is a merge of two previously seperated tracks.
# [[Object Model/Fela ITT Example|/FelaITTExample]], showing an release that is a merge of two previously released releases, and a track that is a merge of two previously seperated tracks.
# [[Object Model/Giant Xmas Example|/GiantXmasExample]], showing a Japanes one-time project as [[Release Artist|ReleaseArtist]].
# [[Object Model/Giant Xmas Example|/GiantXmasExample]], showing a Japanes one-time project as [[Release Artist|ReleaseArtist]].

Revision as of 19:40, 11 May 2006

MusicBrainz Object Model

Status: Attention.png This page needs to be updated to reflect the results of the MusicBrainzSummit7

This page and its subpages form a document that tries to describe the reality that MusicBrainz deals with as abstract /Objects with Properties and /Relationships. This document is not about a database schema. Its purpose is to understand what we are dealing with. Of course, this effort is strongly related to the creation of a NextGenerationSchema.

This document is written in the form of CollectiveWe, and you are invited to BeBold and write things like "we seem to (dis)agree" or "we have forgotten an important aspect...". This should avoid lengthy threaded discussions. Those should better happen on the ExpertsMailingList.

Definitions

When talking about object definitions we need a well defined language. Here are the most important ones:

  • An object is a "thing" in the object model. It does not have to be physical, but it needs boundaries that define what is and what is not an object of this class. Each object class has a SubPage of its own of the form /ThisObject. From the perspective of OO programming we are actually talking about object classes, but it is tedious to always say "an object of the xy class".
    • Note that AdvancedRelationships are objects in the ObjectModel, since they have properties. An object-relationship cannot have properties.
  • A relationship is what links two objects together. This is not a relation as in relational database. So please do not talk about 1:n or n:m relations. A relationship has two such pairs. E.g. An AObject can own 0--many BObjects. A BObject is owned by 0--1 AObjects.
  • An entity is an actual element of the database schema. While this document is not about entities, we might want to talk about them nonetheless. E.g. which objects should be merged into one entity?

These were the most important. The rest is for later.

The Object Model

The actual object model currently consists of the following elements:

  • I propose renaming this to /ArtistLabelObject as a ReleaseArtist is something different now --Shepard
    • Why, is a ReleaseArtist not exactly what we are talking about? "the Artist that appears in the 'artist' field of a Release. There can only be one release artist for each release" (citing ReleaseArtist). The difference is that under NadelnderBambus a release additionally belongs to an album which has one or more 'AlbumArtists', and that the 'ReleaseArtist' is related to the Artists is is composed of. IMO the name is still ok. --DonRedman
      • ReleaseArtist now means the artist of a release object. What was meant here was "a label for the artist name how it is written on releases". This is especially different since it will be linked to release objects _and_ track objects! --Shepard I think I can explain this better: it is about the role of the object. At the moment we have that an Artist object is called ReleaseArtist when it is linked to a Release object and TrackArtist when it is linked to a Track object. In NGS an ArtistLabel would be called ReleaseArtist when it is linked to a Release object and TrackArtist when it is linked to a Track object. So if you say ArtistLabel == ReleaseArtist that would be the same as saying Artist == ReleaseArtist. --Shepard

The following graphic describes the ObjectModel as refined on the summit (code-named "NadelnderBambus"). Note that the names have changed and might change again. Sorry for that:

NadelnderBambus 0 1.png

See the attachments page for some older graphs.

Examples

Now that we have completed a first stab at the objects, we need to check whether they actually fit the reality. Big thanks to everybody who contributed to this list in the Next Generation Database Schema thread on the UsersMailingList.

  1. /FelaITTExample, showing an release that is a merge of two previously released releases, and a track that is a merge of two previously seperated tracks.
  2. /GiantXmasExample, showing a Japanes one-time project as ReleaseArtist.
  3. /ShuujiAndAkiraExample, showing different ReleaseArtist and TrackArtists plus confusing aliases and PerformanceNames.
  4. /TerraRevolutionExample, showing one release with a single track being a megamix of another release.
  5. /PartyPeopleExample, showing an release containing one track being a megamix of all other tracks.
  6. /CassetteboyExample, showing an artist who changes his performance name for every track.
  7. /RunTimeAllStarsExample, showing varying and vague artist collaboration that had only this one release.
  8. /AhhcoExample, showing one track by another artist on a single artist release.
  9. /ElectricLightOrchestraExample, showing an release that has a different name in one country
  10. /AngeldustExample, showing two releases with exact same content, but released under different artist and title.
  11. /ChantsMagnetiquesExample , showing two localized variants onf one release.
  12. /DonSebskyExample, whowing the case of a Jazz composer.
  13. TracksWithMultipleArtists contains an example of its own, showing tracks that consist of more than one song by more than one artist
  14. /QueenPlatinumCollectionExample, showing releases that were re-released as a box set without remastering.
  15. /GylleneTiderExample, showing releases that were re-released as a box set without remastering, and later as single remastered releases.
  16. /JesusChristSuperstarExample, which has tracks containing two songs and poses a challenge to the TrackGroup and AR.
  17. /DepecheModeRemixesExample, showing identical discs on different releases and other problems.