Difference between revisions of "History:Object Model/Cassetteboy Example"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Example (Imported from MoinMoin))
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
   
The Cassetteboy album which was discussed over a year ago <[http:// http://] www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=2885&local=y&query=cassetteboy> [[MusicBrainz]] album: <[http://musicbrainz.org/album/f3e459eb-e17a-4ea9-a8bc- http://musicbrainz.org/album/f3e459eb-e17a-4ea9-a8bc-] 4936301b8c43.html>
+
The Cassetteboy album which was discussed over a year ago <[http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=2885&local=y&query=cassetteboy> http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=2885&local=y&query=cassetteboy>]
  +
* [[MusicBrainz]] album: <[http://musicbrainz.org/album/f3e459eb-e17a-4ea9-a8bc-4936301b8c43.html> http://musicbrainz.org/album/f3e459eb-e17a-4ea9-a8bc-4936301b8c43.html>]
 
* Discogs: <[http://www.discogs.com/artist/Cassetteboy> http://www.discogs.com/artist/Cassetteboy>]
   
 
Here is all the information I could gather from past mails and [[Edit Note|EditNote]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s:
Discogs: <[http://www.discogs.com/artist/Cassetteboy> http://www.discogs.com/artist/Cassetteboy>]
 
   
 
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:03:57 +0200, [[User:TeleGUISE|TeleGUISE]] wrote:
Here is all the information I could gather from past mails and modnotes:
 
 
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:03:57 +0200, teleGUISE wrote:
 
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Being his first & only release with these 'aliases' it's hard to say whether he'd use them again but from reading the meaning behind them I wouldn't think so. It appears the suffix to 'Cassetteboy' is just a description of what the track is about, so i'd say track annotation is more fitting. Secondly, does 'Cassetteboy' even belong in the title or shouldn't the title be split like "Cassetteboy: Mick's Tape"
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Being his first & only release with these 'aliases' it's hard to say whether he'd use them again but from reading the meaning behind them I wouldn't think so. It appears the suffix to 'Cassetteboy' is just a description of what the track is about, so i'd say track annotation is more fitting. Secondly, does 'Cassetteboy' even belong in the title or shouldn't the title be split like "Cassetteboy: Mick's Tape"
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
   
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:30:46 +0200, 'ojnkpjg' attached a note to [http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=3229576 moderation #3229576]:
+
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:30:46 +0200, [[User:ojnkpjg|ojnkpjg]] attached a note to [[Edit:3229576|edit #3229576]]:
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">here's the record label's web page for the album: [http://www.antidoterecords.co.uk/ http://www.antidoterecords.co.uk/] releases/ANTCD112.htm they do list the cassetteboy variations as the performer of the tracks, however it does seem like playful information that seems more like additional title info than a performance name. for what it 's worth, there are other websites whose tracklistings show only 'cassetteboy' as the performer of those tracks (e.g., [http:// http://] www.moviegrooves.com/shop/cassetteboymickstape.htm ). i'm not sure how to handle this, really. i suppose if an artist declares, "I've performed track 1 as G, track 2 as H, track 3 as I," etc., who are we to argue.
+
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">here's the record label's web page for the album: [http://www.antidoterecords.co.uk/releases/ANTCD112.htm http://www.antidoterecords.co.uk/releases/ANTCD112.htm] they do list the cassetteboy variations as the performer of the tracks, however it does seem like playful information that seems more like additional title info than a performance name. for what it 's worth, there are other websites whose tracklistings show only 'cassetteboy' as the performer of those tracks (e.g., [http://www.moviegrooves.com/shop/cassetteboymickstape.htm http://www.moviegrooves.com/shop/cassetteboymickstape.htm] ). i'm not sure how to handle this, really. i suppose if an artist declares, "I've performed track 1 as G, track 2 as H, track 3 as I," etc., who are we to argue.
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]]
 

Latest revision as of 22:27, 25 October 2011

Example: CassetteBoy - Mick's Tape

  • showing an artist who changes his performance name for every track.

The Cassetteboy album which was discussed over a year ago <> http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=2885&local=y&query=cassetteboy>

Here is all the information I could gather from past mails and EditNotes:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:03:57 +0200, TeleGUISE wrote:

  • Being his first & only release with these 'aliases' it's hard to say whether he'd use them again but from reading the meaning behind them I wouldn't think so. It appears the suffix to 'Cassetteboy' is just a description of what the track is about, so i'd say track annotation is more fitting. Secondly, does 'Cassetteboy' even belong in the title or shouldn't the title be split like "Cassetteboy: Mick's Tape"

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:30:46 +0200, ojnkpjg attached a note to edit #3229576:

  • here's the record label's web page for the album: http://www.antidoterecords.co.uk/releases/ANTCD112.htm they do list the cassetteboy variations as the performer of the tracks, however it does seem like playful information that seems more like additional title info than a performance name. for what it 's worth, there are other websites whose tracklistings show only 'cassetteboy' as the performer of those tracks (e.g., http://www.moviegrooves.com/shop/cassetteboymickstape.htm ). i'm not sure how to handle this, really. i suppose if an artist declares, "I've performed track 1 as G, track 2 as H, track 3 as I," etc., who are we to argue.