Difference between revisions of "History:Prefer Specific Relationship Types Proposal"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(proposal passed, but leaving the bits which depend on other changes here)
m (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal:Prefer Specific Relationship Types to History:Prefer Specific Relationship Types Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This proposal has now passed, see [[Advanced Relationship Style]], however, two lines depend on other changes, those have been left here until the relevant changes happen.
 
This proposal has now passed, see [[Advanced Relationship Style]], however, two lines depend on other changes, those have been left here until the relevant changes happen.
   
  +
==RFC-251==
 
 
When [[Talk:Proposals#RFC-251:_Change_how_we_handle_Engineers_and_their_roles|RFC-251]] is implemented, change:
 
When [[Talk:Proposals#RFC-251:_Change_how_we_handle_Engineers_and_their_roles|RFC-251]] is implemented, change:
 
* [[Engineer_Relationship_Type|Engineer]]: prefer [[Audio_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Audio Engineer]], [[Editor_Relationship_Type|Editor]], [[Mastering_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mastering Engineer]], [[Mix_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mix Engineer]], [[Recording_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Recording Engineer]], [[Sound_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Sound Engineer]] and/or [[Programmer_Relationship_Type|Programmer]]. If the Engineer type is either Balance Engineer or Tonmeister, the generic Engineer type should be used, and '''not''' one of the more specific Engineer types.
 
* [[Engineer_Relationship_Type|Engineer]]: prefer [[Audio_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Audio Engineer]], [[Editor_Relationship_Type|Editor]], [[Mastering_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mastering Engineer]], [[Mix_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mix Engineer]], [[Recording_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Recording Engineer]], [[Sound_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Sound Engineer]] and/or [[Programmer_Relationship_Type|Programmer]]. If the Engineer type is either Balance Engineer or Tonmeister, the generic Engineer type should be used, and '''not''' one of the more specific Engineer types.
Line 11: Line 11:
   
   
  +
If/when the writer relationship is added, add:
 
  +
* [[Proposal:Writer_Relationship_Type|Writer]]: prefer [[Composer_Relationship_Type|Composer]], [[Lyricist_Relationship_Type|Lyricist]] and/or [[Librettist_Relationship_Type|Librettist]]
 
  +
and on [[Engineer_Relationship_Type]], change:
  +
* In many cases, the [[Audio_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Audio Engineer]], [[Editor_Relationship_Type|Editor]], [[Mastering_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mastering Engineer]], [[Mix_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Mix Engineer]], [[Recording_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Recording Engineer]], [[Sound_Engineer_Relationship_Type|Sound Engineer]] and/or [[Programmer_Relationship_Type|Programmer]] relationship types should be used instead. If the Engineer relationship type is either Balance Engineer or Tonmeister, the generic Engineer relationship type should be used, and not one of the more specific Engineer relationship types. For details, see the [[Advanced_Relationship_Style#Prefer_Specific_Relationship_Types|Prefer Specific Relationship Types]] guideline.
  +
  +
to
  +
  +
* Be as specific as possible and specify the type of engineering that was performed, but only if you have a source or if you can deduce this information. For details, see the [[Advanced_Relationship_Style#Prefer_Specific_Relationship_Types|Prefer Specific Relationship Types]] guideline.
  +
  +
  +
  +
and to [[Engineer_Position_Relationship_Type]], add:
  +
  +
* Be as specific as possible and specify the type of engineering position that was held, but only if you have a source or if you can deduce this information. For details, see the [[Advanced_Relationship_Style#Prefer_Specific_Relationship_Types|Prefer Specific Relationship Types]] guideline.

Latest revision as of 20:33, 28 August 2016

This proposal has now passed, see Advanced Relationship Style, however, two lines depend on other changes, those have been left here until the relevant changes happen.

RFC-251

When RFC-251 is implemented, change:

to

  • Engineer: prefer selecting the correct information from the Engineer tree.
  • Engineer Position: prefer selecting the correct information from the Engineer tree.



and on Engineer_Relationship_Type, change:

to

  • Be as specific as possible and specify the type of engineering that was performed, but only if you have a source or if you can deduce this information. For details, see the Prefer Specific Relationship Types guideline.


and to Engineer_Position_Relationship_Type, add:

  • Be as specific as possible and specify the type of engineering position that was held, but only if you have a source or if you can deduce this information. For details, see the Prefer Specific Relationship Types guideline.