Difference between revisions of "History:Release Status"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(fix typo + use interwiki syntax (Imported from MoinMoin))
(+ Link to Transl*tion; was searching for it here from time to time (Imported from MoinMoin))
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
===Pseudo-Release===
 
===Pseudo-Release===
   
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">A pseudo-release is a duplicate release for translation/transliteration purposes. It allows us to retain and link to useful translation/transliteration info until [[Next Generation Schema|NextGenerationSchema]] allows us to display the info in a better way.
+
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">A pseudo-release is used at one end of a [[Translation Transliteration Relationship Type|TranslationTransliterationRelationshipType]]. It allows us to retain and link to useful translation/transliteration info until [[Next Generation Schema|NextGenerationSchema]] allows us to display the info in a better way.
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
   
Line 47: Line 47:
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I think it should be determined as if it is a separate entry. Live releases are Live, Remix releases are Remix, bonus discs with just a few tracks, e.g. different versions, are probably best categorised as Other. --[[User:Zout|Zout]]
 
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I think it should be determined as if it is a separate entry. Live releases are Live, Remix releases are Remix, bonus discs with just a few tracks, e.g. different versions, are probably best categorised as Other. --[[User:Zout|Zout]]
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  +
  +
Would it be possible to tighten up the definition of "Official" to read something like "A release sanctioned by the legal copyright holder(s), usually including an artist and their record company, with the product being available for retail sale"? With pretty much anything officially released by a record company, there is a profit motive. Lots of mp3s are only semi-official, as they are available for free from various websites, evidently without the various copyright holders' specific permissions, but with little likelihood of a lawsuit. I would include such semi-official freebies as part of the "promotion" category. --[[Arty Smokes|ArtySmokes]]
   
 
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]]
 
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]]

Revision as of 10:16, 22 July 2008

Attention.png This is a working draft to update our ReleaseStatus definition and wording. For the currently approved and official styleguide, check the page in the official documentation.

The Release Status is a ReleaseAttribute that describes how 'official' a Release is. The following status are available:




Guidelines for Release Status

The type should apply to most of the tracks on the release. It's OK to have a couple of tracks that do not fit the release type, as long as the type applies to the release overall.

List of possible Release Status

Official

  • Any release officially sanctioned by the artist and/or their record company. (Most releases will fit into this category.)

Promotion

  • A give-away release or a release intended to promote an upcoming official release. (e.g. pre-release versions or releases included with a magazine, versions supplied to radio DJs for air-play, etc).

Bootleg

  • An unofficial/underground release that was not sanctioned by the artist and/or the record company. This includes unofficial live recordings, pirated releases, and custom burnt compilations. In the latter case, we do not sanction entering custom compilation CDs (homebrews) into MusicBrainz, as this information has little relevance to anyone besides the creator. One of the challenges in this system is to identify the "real" bootlegs from the homebrews.

Pseudo-Release



Discussion

Q: What's the status of a BonusDisc?

My take on this is that the release status should be the same as the release it came with. So a bonus disc with an official release should be marked Official. The release type has to be judged from the content - I've seen releases, eps, singles and compilations as bonus discs. --ZeroGravitas

  • I think it should be determined as if it is a separate entry. Live releases are Live, Remix releases are Remix, bonus discs with just a few tracks, e.g. different versions, are probably best categorised as Other. --Zout

Would it be possible to tighten up the definition of "Official" to read something like "A release sanctioned by the legal copyright holder(s), usually including an artist and their record company, with the product being available for retail sale"? With pretty much anything officially released by a record company, there is a profit motive. Lots of mp3s are only semi-official, as they are available for free from various websites, evidently without the various copyright holders' specific permissions, but with little likelihood of a lawsuit. I would include such semi-official freebies as part of the "promotion" category. --ArtySmokes