Difference between revisions of "History:Transcription Relationship Type Proposal"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
m (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal:Transcription Relationship Type to History:Transcription Relationship Type Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|trac=
 
|trac=
 
}}
 
}}
{{Template:Relationship
 
  
|type = transcription of
+
== Description ==
|proposal=1
 
|class = Alternative Version
 
  
|linkedFrom1  = Work
+
This indicates that a work that was intented to be played by certain instrument was re-written (transcribed) to be performed by another instrument.
|linkText1    = is a transcription <nowiki>{{for instrument}}</nowiki> of:
 
|linkedTo1    = Work
 
  
|linkedFrom2  = Work
+
== Link Phrases ==
|linkText2    = transcribed versions <nowiki>{{for instrument}}</nowiki>:
 
|linkedTo2    = Work
 
  
|attributeName1        = instrument
+
* [[Work]] is a transcription <nowiki>{{for instrument}}</nowiki> of: [[Work]]
|attributeDescription1 = This special version of this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]] indicates for what kind of instrument the work was transcribed to.
+
* [[Work]] transcribed versions <nowiki>{{for instrument}}</nowiki>: [[Work]]
|attributePage1        = Instrument Relationship Attribute
 
  
|summary = This indicates that a work that was intented to be played by certain instrument was re-written (transcribed) to be performed by another instrument.
+
== Attributes ==
  
|style = This relationship should only be used when the score of a composition has be re-written to be played by another instrument then it was intended by the original composer. This relationship covers also reductions. The person who did the transcription should be credited via the "instrumentation" relationship. For minor modifications in a work or improvised variations by an artist please use the "arranged" relationship on recording level.
+
*; '''start date'''
 +
: There is no guideline yet for how the begin date fields might be used.
  
 +
*; '''end date'''
 +
: There is no guideline yet for how the end date fields might be used.
 +
 +
*; instrument
 +
: This special version of this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]] indicates for what kind of instrument the work was transcribed to.
 +
 +
== Guidelines ==
 +
 +
This relationship should only be used when the score of a composition has be re-written to be played by another instrument then it was intended by the original composer. This relationship covers also reductions. The person who did the transcription should be credited via the "instrumentation" relationship. For minor modifications in a work or improvised variations by an artist please use the "arranged" relationship on recording level.
  
}}
 
 
[[Category:Proposed Relationship Type]]
 
[[Category:Proposed Relationship Type]]

Latest revision as of 21:04, 28 August 2016


Status: This page describes an active proposal and is not official.



Proposal number: RFC-Unassigned
Champion: lorenz p.
Current status: pre-rfc
Initial Discussion



Description

This indicates that a work that was intented to be played by certain instrument was re-written (transcribed) to be performed by another instrument.

Link Phrases

  • Work is a transcription {{for instrument}} of: Work
  • Work transcribed versions {{for instrument}}: Work

Attributes

  • start date
There is no guideline yet for how the begin date fields might be used.
  • end date
There is no guideline yet for how the end date fields might be used.
  • instrument
This special version of this relationship type indicates for what kind of instrument the work was transcribed to.

Guidelines

This relationship should only be used when the score of a composition has be re-written to be played by another instrument then it was intended by the original composer. This relationship covers also reductions. The person who did the transcription should be credited via the "instrumentation" relationship. For minor modifications in a work or improvised variations by an artist please use the "arranged" relationship on recording level.