History:Transcription Relationship Type Proposal: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|summary = This indicates that a work that was intented to be played by certain instrument was re-written (transcribed) to be performed by another instrument. |
|summary = This indicates that a work that was intented to be played by certain instrument was re-written (transcribed) to be performed by another instrument. |
||
|style = This relationship should only be used when the score of a composition has be re-written to be played by another instrument then it was intended by the original composer. |
|style = This relationship should only be used when the score of a composition has be re-written to be played by another instrument then it was intended by the original composer. This relationship covers also reductions. The person who did the transcription should be credited via the "instrumentation" relationship. For minor modifications in a work or improvised variations by an artist please use the "arranged" relationship on recording level. |
||
Revision as of 12:29, 5 July 2011
| Status: This page describes an active proposal and is not official. |
|
|
