History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Revision as of 22:03, 27 August 2016 by CallerNo6 (talk | contribs) (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) to History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Series

Me love! Especially I love the series proposal if it would mean that we would dump the volume number style guideline (which is used for keeping releases in a series together even if their names don't really imply it). //bnw

"Group" vs "Band"

Re: Entities, related concepts: what's the difference between "Group" and "Band?" Also, I think it'd be nice to have Collaboration, too. I'd also like to see a UPC and ISBN AR link for releases. ojnkpjg

  • A "Group" is a more general term. A band is a group as is an orchestra, but an orchestra is not a band. Though these related concepts list was not meant to be exclusive, I just wanted to list some terms that are used yet and are related to the Artist entity and perhaps could lead to some discussion about more subtypes of this entity. I don't think we need an entity for UPC or ISBNs. In ReleaseDataSet I wrote another proposal that covers this. --Shepard
Retrieved from "https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/index.php?title=History_talk:Advanced_Entity_(Post-NGS)_Proposal&oldid=70751"