History talk:CSG Standard/Grieg: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(Op. 23)
Line 2: Line 2:
** Imho '''no''', at least not for the two suites as they are imho meant to be separate be the composer (not like "Edvard Grieg: Peer Gynt - Selections / Highlights / whatever" by $publisher) --[[User:Mineo|Mineo]] 09:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
** Imho '''no''', at least not for the two suites as they are imho meant to be separate be the composer (not like "Edvard Grieg: Peer Gynt - Selections / Highlights / whatever" by $publisher) --[[User:Mineo|Mineo]] 09:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
*** The question was about Op. 23, not the suites. --[[User:Mvordeme|Mvordeme]] 19:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
*** The question was about Op. 23, not the suites. --[[User:Mvordeme|Mvordeme]] 19:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
** It's not an opera, but I think you should add acts/scenes. Follow the original score, if possible. (BTW when we get the "works" entity, Op. 23 should probably have an annotation saying "you probably want the suites")

Revision as of 20:56, 8 May 2011

  • Should Opera Track Style be used for Peer Gynt, meaning acts and scenes have to be added, even though it is not the complete opera?
    • Imho no, at least not for the two suites as they are imho meant to be separate be the composer (not like "Edvard Grieg: Peer Gynt - Selections / Highlights / whatever" by $publisher) --Mineo 09:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
      • The question was about Op. 23, not the suites. --Mvordeme 19:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
    • It's not an opera, but I think you should add acts/scenes. Follow the original score, if possible. (BTW when we get the "works" entity, Op. 23 should probably have an annotation saying "you probably want the suites")