Difference between revisions of "History talk:Next Generation Schema/Release Editor"
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Removing all content from page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Open questions about the schema: |
||
| − | |||
| − | * Why do we have a table called track and a table called recording? What purpose do they serve? |
||
| − | ** I think the [[Next_Generation_Schema#Track|NGS]] page explains it well. [[User:LukasLalinsky|Lukáš Lalinský]] 19:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * Why does the recording table have an artist_credit that is not an FK and track does as well, but there its not an FK? Is this a graph error? |
||
| − | ** Error in the diagram, it's fixed now. [[User:LukasLalinsky|Lukáš Lalinský]] 19:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * Why do both recording and track have an artist_credit and name? |
||
| − | ** Because that's what humans tend to use as identifiers. :) They normally wouldn't know "b98ee5f2-0b07-4da6-913c-acfe19d4578d", but they mostly likely do know what "Thriller by Michael Jackson" is. That's for recordings. I think it's obvious why tracks need to have artist credits and names. [[User:LukasLalinsky|Lukáš Lalinský]] 19:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | (Can we please move this discussion to [[Talk:Next Generation Schema]]? [[User:LukasLalinsky|Lukáš Lalinský]] 19:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)) |
||
