History talk:Next Generation Schema/Release Relationships Conversion: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:38, 27 June 2009

a covert art for release-group would be useful too, but I guess that could be done by choosing one of links of releases (without requiring an AR) -- murdos 11:28, 08 December 2008 (UTC)
purchase for mail-order, purchase for download, download for free, creative commons licensed download: I presume you mean "all releases (events) of the defunct album", not "all releases of the new release_group". -- murdos 11:28, 08 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice this comment before. Yes, I mean release events of an album. In the initial import, "release event" == "release", "release (previously album)" == "release group", so that's the same thing. -- LukasLalinsky 09:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

For album-album, part of set: Can we just ask the community to merge the release groups before NGS and then simply drop the link when NGS comes?

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * purchase for mail-order, purchase for download, download for free, creative commons licensed download: I presume you mean "all releases (events) of the defunct album", not "all releases of the new release_group". -- [[User:murdos|murdos]] 11:28, 08 December 2008 (UTC)
 ** Sorry, I didn't notice this comment before. Yes, I mean release events of an album. In the initial import, "release event" == "release", "release (previously album)" == "release group", so that's the same thing. -- [[User:LukasLalinsky|LukasLalinsky]] 09:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
+* For album-album, part of set: Can we just ask the community to merge the release groups before NGS and then simply drop the link when NGS comes?