History talk:Next Generation Schema/Release Relationships Conversion

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
  • a covert art for release-group would be useful too, but I guess that could be done by choosing one of links of releases (without requiring an AR) -- murdos 11:28, 08 December 2008 (UTC)
  • purchase for mail-order, purchase for download, download for free, creative commons licensed download: I presume you mean "all releases (events) of the defunct album", not "all releases of the new release_group". -- murdos 11:28, 08 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I didn't notice this comment before. Yes, I mean release events of an album. In the initial import, "release event" == "release", "release (previously album)" == "release group", so that's the same thing. -- LukasLalinsky 09:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For album-album, part of set: Can we just ask the community to merge the release groups before NGS and then simply drop the link when NGS comes?
    • The part of set relationships represents multi-disc releases, which are entities we don't have in the DB yet. Lukáš Lalinský 09:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • nikki, I noticed you noticed some release AR types still not listed. I've not checked against it, but http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Category:Relationship_Type has the full listing (minus the last 1 or 2 that have been recently added); it might be worth checking for any of the Release types there which still might not be handled/listed here. BrianFreud 10:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
    • I was checking the page where we edit relationship types, that has the full list of relationships in the database. Nikki 13:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)