History talk:Next Generation Schema/Track Relationships Conversion: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
BrianFreud (talk | contribs) (New page: ==New work-work ARs to create== If we're talking about obvious ones that'll be needed, the most obvious, to me, would seem to be some way to support real "works" and opuses; ie, a 1:n "rea...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==New work-work ARs to create== |
==New work-work ARs to create== |
||
If we're talking about obvious ones that'll be needed, the most obvious, to me, would seem to be some way to support real "works" and opuses; ie, a 1:n "real work":works (Mozart's Requiem:movement 1, Mozart's Requiem:movement 2, etc) and opuses (a collection of "real works"). That may include lkWork entities for "real works" and opuses, rather than just work-work ARs. Additionally, the former would need some sort of attribute for optional movements, and perhaps some attribute for position within the overall "real work". [[User:BrianFreud|BrianFreud]] 03:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC) |
If we're talking about obvious ones that'll be needed, the most obvious, to me, would seem to be some way to support real "works" and opuses; ie, a 1:n "real work":works (Mozart's Requiem:movement 1, Mozart's Requiem:movement 2, etc) and opuses (a collection of "real works"). That may include lkWork entities for "real works" and opuses, rather than just work-work ARs. Additionally, the former would need some sort of attribute for optional movements, and perhaps some attribute for position within the overall "real work". [[User:BrianFreud|BrianFreud]] 03:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Could you define again "lkWork"? [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 06:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:27, 6 September 2010
New work-work ARs to create
If we're talking about obvious ones that'll be needed, the most obvious, to me, would seem to be some way to support real "works" and opuses; ie, a 1:n "real work":works (Mozart's Requiem:movement 1, Mozart's Requiem:movement 2, etc) and opuses (a collection of "real works"). That may include lkWork entities for "real works" and opuses, rather than just work-work ARs. Additionally, the former would need some sort of attribute for optional movements, and perhaps some attribute for position within the overall "real work". BrianFreud 03:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Could you define again "lkWork"? Murdos 06:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
