Instrumental Style: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(answer discussion (Imported from MoinMoin)) |
m (double redirect) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[History:Instrumental Style Proposal]] |
|||
=Style for instrumental Songs= |
|||
'''This is an [[Proposed Style Guideline|ProposedStyleGuideline]]'''. It is a sub-style of the more general [[Extra Title Information Style|ExtraTitleInformationStyle]]. |
|||
Tracks labeled as ''instrumental'' should be listed as '''Title''' '''''(instrumental)''''' with the word instrumental without abbreviation and all lowercase. This is consistent with [[Style Principle|StylePrinciple]]. |
|||
Note that this is different from the case where ''instrumental'' is version info, i.e., there is a regular version with vocals and an instrumental version. In that case, which is covered by [[Remix Style|RemixStyle]], it is to be included anyways. |
|||
==Example== |
|||
He Loves U Not (instrumental) |
|||
==Discussion== |
|||
see [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-April/002200.html archive thread] -- [[User:WolfSong|WolfSong]] 03:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
-- I think there should be some way to enter the word "instrumental" in the native language of the release. Otherwise it would be entered twice; one for native language and other for English. Maybe some type of look-up table can be used for identifying the corresponding word for the native release language. -- ''syserror'' |
|||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I don't understand what you mean. Of course if something is labelled "instrumental" in another language, then that word is to be used. -- [[User:Shepard|Shepard]] 13:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
</ul> |
|||
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] [[Category:Proposed Style]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 28 August 2016
Redirect to:
