Instrumental Style: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (double redirect)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[History:Instrumental Style Proposal]]
Also relevant to this discussion is [http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=4643690 edit 4643690] where wolfsong tried to add (instrumental) to Metallica's song "Orion". To summarize: Because the song is *always* instrumental it was decided that the version info was not necessary and would not be appended to the title despite the fact that "(instrumental)" is printed on the CD. -[[User:AaronCooper|AaronCooper]], 2007-10-18

see [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-April/002200.html archive thread] -- [[User:WolfSong|WolfSong]] 03:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

-- I think there should be some way to enter the word "instrumental" in the native language of the release. Otherwise it would be entered twice; one for native language and other for English. Maybe some type of look-up table can be used for identifying the corresponding word for the native release language. -- ''syserror''
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I don't understand what you mean. Of course if something is labelled "instrumental" in another language, then that word is to be used. -- [[User:Shepard|Shepard]] 13:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
</ul>

Would that mean that the extra information "instrumental" would always be used, even if the official track title does not include it? If this is intended with this proposal I would suggest using the upcoming [[Folksonomy Tag|FolksonomyTag]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>gin for this instead. There is not need to add that information to every track title. -- [[User:OutsideContext|OutsideContext]]

Latest revision as of 22:32, 28 August 2016