Label/FAQ: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(test (Imported from MoinMoin))
(test (Imported from MoinMoin))
Line 38: Line 38:
===Where to discuss problems and enhancements suggestions?===
===Where to discuss problems and enhancements suggestions?===


Discussion about the current system and documentation should go to the [[Talk:Label|LabelDiscussion]] page. Links to tickets and new master plans for future enhancements should go to the [[Label Future|LabelFuture]] page.
Discussion about the current system and documentation should go to the [http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/LabelDiscussion LabelDiscussion] page. Links to tickets and new master plans for future enhancements should go to the [[Label Future|LabelFuture]] page.


----
----

Revision as of 19:56, 5 April 2007

Template:LabelsStatus Template:LabelNavigation

Table of contents

Purpose

This page answers some basic questions about Labels.

If you would like to update the content of this page on the wiki, feel free to do so but please do not add questions without answers (you might rather want to use LabelDiscussion for that).

FAQ

How do you "relate" a label and a release?

When adding a ReleaseEvent, you can additionally specify a LabelName, ReleaseCatalogNumber, and an EAN. This is a core relation between labels and releases (not to be confused with AdvancedRelationships). At that time, there are no AdvancedRelationships between labels and releases.



How to handle autoreleases?

In some cases, artists "autoproduce" and "autorelease" their own records. As long as an imprint is possible to positively identify, it should be used as a label entry. If there's no such thing, or if the creation of such a label entry is disputable, we may want to use SpecialPurposeLabels (possibly [autorelease]). This need to be discussed further on the LabelDiscussion page.



Can an imprint and the company that controls it have the same name?

Yes, definitely. Actually, a company "A" may sell its own imprint "A" to another company "B" and continue to exist as company "A", while the imprint is being operated by company "B"... This can result in really confusing situations... Usually though, editors in MusicBrainz will deal with imprints exclusively (which *is* the information available on sleeves).

In the old days, there was actually no clear distinction between an imprint and the company that controlled it. Nowadays though, things got much more complex. Whether or not something requires two distinct entries in the database is up to the editor, and should be decided on a case by case basis (though we think that in most cases, just one entry is enough).



Where to discuss problems and enhancements suggestions?

Discussion about the current system and documentation should go to the LabelDiscussion page. Links to tickets and new master plans for future enhancements should go to the LabelFuture page.



Are "collections" valid imprints?

This is a difficult question that can't be solved generally, but only on a case by case basis. Hence, the use of a label entry for collections names must be made with extra-care. Definitely, one must not use collection names printed on the front cover as a label name, but only if the collection name is used in place of the label name (usually on the back cover, next to a catalog number), and is really used by the producing label as is. For example, the "Verve Jazz Masters" releases are from label "Verve", dot, and "Jazz Masters" should be part of the release name. On the other hand, "Original Jazz Classics" is an imprint, owned by label "Fantasy".

Template:LabelIntertwingling