Label/Label Code: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Imported from MoinMoin))
No edit summary
(19 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Description==


"The Label Code (LC) was introduced in 1977 by the IFPI (International Federation of Phonogram and Videogram Industries) in order to unmistakably identify the different record labels (see Introduction, Record labels) for rights purposes. The Label Code consists historically of 4 figures, presently being extended to 5 figures, preceded by LC and a dash (e.g. LC-0193 = Electrola; LC-0233 = His Master's Voice). Note that the number of countries using the LC is limited, and that the code given on the item is not always accurate." [http://www.iasa-web.org/icat/08_0.htm http://www.iasa-web.org/icat/08_0.htm]
<small>[[Label]] > Label Code </small>


A '''label code''' should not be confused with a release's [[Release/Catalog Number|catalog number]]. A catalog number identifies a particular release, whereas a label code identifies an entire [[Label|label]].
{{LabelsStatus}}

==Description==
When entering a label code in MusicBrainz, use only the numerical part, with or without leading zeros, which is the only relevant part stored in the database.

==Additional information==


Note that subsidiaries do not necessarily have an independent label code, and may just use the label code of their parent label.
"The Label Code (LC) was introduced in 1977 by the IFPI (International Federation of Phonogram and Videogram Industries) in order to unmistakably identify the different record labels (see Introduction, Record labels) for rights purposes. The Label Code consists historically of 4 figures, presently being extended to 5 figures, preceded by LC and a dash (e.g. LC-0193 = Electrola; LC-0233 = His Master's Voice). Note that the number of countries using the LC is limited, and that the code given on the item is not always accurate." [http://www.iasa-web.org/icat/08_0.htm http://www.iasa-web.org/icat/08_0.htm]


Also note that entering a label with label code that is already in use in MusicBrainz requires you to add a [[Disambiguation Comment|disambiguation comment]].
A '''Label Code''' should not be confused with a [[Release Catalog Number|ReleaseCatalogNumber]]. A catalog number identifies a particular release, whereas a label code identifies an entire [[Label]].


==Official resources==
When entering a '''Label Code''' in [[MusicBrainz]], use only the numerical part.


* http://labelcode.gvl.de/ (German)
==Discussion==


==Unofficial resources==
[[User:ClutchEr2|ClutchEr2]] [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2005-June/021163.html reports] that very recent CDs do not have a [[Catalog Number|CatalogNumber]]. Instead they use the [[Barcode|BarCode]] without the trailing zero and 13th check digit number.
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">This is only partly true as far as I can tell. A lot of (small) labels still use internal catalog numbering, and I've also seen some labels using a smaller part of the barcode. Anyhow, this should be moved out from this page, as it pertains to [[Release Catalog Number|ReleaseCatalogNumber]], not to LabelCode. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 19:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
</ul>


Please treat these lists with care, they are unofficial. Don't use them as sole reference!
I have never encountered a label code with a hyphen before. I suggest we stick to just LCxxxx in [[MusicBrainz]] to stay as close to what's printed on covers and discs as possible. -- [[User:Prodoc|Prodoc]] 22:11, 08 November 2006 (UTC)
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I don't think we should even store the LC(-) part. Storing xxxx in the database IMO is enough, as this is the only relevant part. How it is displayed is another and IMO irrelevant problem. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 01:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
</ul>


* http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Labelcodes (German)
There have been [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2007-January/015517.html some discussion] lately about concurrent/additional label identification systems in the wild, apparently dependent of the country. At that time, we lack informations about how these relate to the '''Label Code''' system, and there is no solution foreseen. '''Please provide input''' on that thread if you have more informations. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 19:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
* http://rateyourmusic.com/wiki/Music:Label+codes
* http://www.musik-sammler.de/wiki/index.php?title=Labelcodes
* http://www.phonector.com/s/liste-der-labelcodes-lc-codes-00001.html


[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] [[Category:Terminology]] [[Category:Label]]
[[Category:Terminology]] [[Category:Label]] [[Category:Identifier]] [[Category:WikiDocs Page]]

Revision as of 14:16, 8 September 2015

Description

"The Label Code (LC) was introduced in 1977 by the IFPI (International Federation of Phonogram and Videogram Industries) in order to unmistakably identify the different record labels (see Introduction, Record labels) for rights purposes. The Label Code consists historically of 4 figures, presently being extended to 5 figures, preceded by LC and a dash (e.g. LC-0193 = Electrola; LC-0233 = His Master's Voice). Note that the number of countries using the LC is limited, and that the code given on the item is not always accurate." http://www.iasa-web.org/icat/08_0.htm

A label code should not be confused with a release's catalog number. A catalog number identifies a particular release, whereas a label code identifies an entire label.

When entering a label code in MusicBrainz, use only the numerical part, with or without leading zeros, which is the only relevant part stored in the database.

Additional information

Note that subsidiaries do not necessarily have an independent label code, and may just use the label code of their parent label.

Also note that entering a label with label code that is already in use in MusicBrainz requires you to add a disambiguation comment.

Official resources

Unofficial resources

Please treat these lists with care, they are unofficial. Don't use them as sole reference!