MusicBottle/Integrating Commercial Services

From MusicBrainz Wiki
< MusicBottle
Revision as of 02:49, 12 January 2013 by Freso (talk | contribs) (Various notes from a discussion on how to process "partnership" requests from commercial partners in #musicbottle)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

General outline

Needs to be expanded quite a bit; see notes below.

  1. Make a post to musicbottle@lists.musicbrainz.org with details.
  2. Discuss pros and cons, including relevance for current agreements.
    1. discuss implementation possibilities.
  3. Vote or make decision in some other way.

Notes

On the process

  • its all about the community and it contributors.


  • when someone enters the process, they should have an idea of what the expected outcome might be.
  • meaning that someone who meets all the criteria outlined by out should reasonable be able to expect to work with us.


  • another thing to consider are limited time agreements.
  • we'll try and work with you for x months.
  • if we dont like it, you get the boot.
  • making that clear can avoid misgivings when someone gets the boot.
  • and we should leave booting someone as a clear option.
  • we should not enter into anything that forces us to:
    1. do something long term
    2. exclusively.
    3. exposes us to liability
    4. provide indemnification for anything.


  • if there's no useful, music-related content provided, there's no way we should have them in here

On who should decide the outcome

  • [ruaok is] happy to lay my experience out for people when bringing a decision to the table.
  • another possibility is to make a committee of people whose members can vote on these decisions, but the committee's communications are open for everyone to see.