Difference between revisions of "Proposal:Artist Type Other"
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Update 1: typo) |
(→Artist Type: Other: removing example "Elmo" since it is not that clear) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This proposal is about a new [[Artist Type|ArtistType]] "Other". Many artists don't fit into the Group/Person scheme, e.g.: |
This proposal is about a new [[Artist Type|ArtistType]] "Other". Many artists don't fit into the Group/Person scheme, e.g.: |
||
| − | # Some fictional characters (animals, mythical creatures, ...), e.g.: [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/101eddc5-e066-466a-8658-ab4b51fa4a78 Pumuckl |
+ | # Some fictional characters (animals, mythical creatures, ...), e.g.: [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/101eddc5-e066-466a-8658-ab4b51fa4a78 Pumuckl] |
# Some fictional artists are purely created to keep a series together, e.g. [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/e028fab5-39ae-4ed9-b8c2-c4344d88b171 Die drei ???] |
# Some fictional artists are purely created to keep a series together, e.g. [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/e028fab5-39ae-4ed9-b8c2-c4344d88b171 Die drei ???] |
||
# Companies that were created to credit them in a relationship, but that are not labels, e.g. [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/a5bccffd-5abf-4a46-a6e2-4f23ffe1f5d0 Type2error] |
# Companies that were created to credit them in a relationship, but that are not labels, e.g. [http://musicbrainz.org/artist/a5bccffd-5abf-4a46-a6e2-4f23ffe1f5d0 Type2error] |
||
Revision as of 02:59, 12 July 2011
| Status: This page describes an active proposal and is not official. |
|
|
Artist Type: Other
This proposal is about a new ArtistType "Other". Many artists don't fit into the Group/Person scheme, e.g.:
- Some fictional characters (animals, mythical creatures, ...), e.g.: Pumuckl
- Some fictional artists are purely created to keep a series together, e.g. Die drei ???
- Companies that were created to credit them in a relationship, but that are not labels, e.g. Type2error
There are probably even more categories. Because all of them are pretty rare compared to Person/Group and are not really in the focus of this database, I suggest a catch-all type "Other" for them. Using "Unknown" is not a really good alternative, because
- Searching for "Unknown" artists should only show artists where further research will eventually result in another type
- "Unknown" artists can be changed to any type as auto-edit, so if someone wants to leave an artist "Unknown" on purpose, anybody can change the type without vote
Update 1
If this proposal passes and the "Other" type gets implemented, the old wiki page will get replaced by this one. --Hrglgrmpf 00:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
