Difference between revisions of "Proposal:Gender other clarification"
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (RFV) |
(made changes, creating redirect) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | #REDIRECT [[Style/Artist]] |
||
| − | {{Template:proposal |
||
| − | |proposal=338 |
||
| − | |discussion=http://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz/2011/2011-10/2011-10-25.html#T21-21-23-980520 |
||
| − | |champion=[[User:Hrglgrmpf|hrglgrmpf]] |
||
| − | |rfc=http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2011-October/013854.html |
||
| − | |rfv=http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2011-November/013979.html |
||
| − | |status=RFV |
||
| − | |ar= |
||
| − | |style=true |
||
| − | }} |
||
| − | |||
| − | =Clarification for gender "other"= |
||
| − | |||
| − | The proposal is to add this paragraph to the ''Gender'' chapter in [[Style/Artist]]: |
||
| − | The 'other' gender option is meant to represent a gender that is neither male nor female, and is not intended |
||
| − | for use with entities for which the concept of gender is illogical, such as companies. |
||
| − | |||
| − | The reason is that the "other" option was meant as a neutral/umbrella term for transgender artists, not as a ''none'' or ''n/a'' option. If such an option is wanted, it should be introduced as fourth option, and e.g. groups should also be (implicitly) set to this type. |
||
Latest revision as of 05:51, 9 November 2011
Redirect to:
