Proposal:New Feature Suggestions
Feature Wishes and New Feature Suggestions
This is a brainstorming page. You can add a feature here and hope that somebody picks it up. But this is not likely to happen at all. This page contains one long messy list and it is not used for active referencing very much.
Therefore if you want to help with TurningYourIdeasIntoReality then it is better to:
- contact us in the MailingList and discuss your ideas with us
- Write a FeaturePage (see HowToWriteFeatureSuggestions)
- If you are willing to work on it (or have found someone to do it for you) then list (and describe!) your FeaturePage on FutureWork or CurrentWork.
Too Long List of Feature Suggestions:
I'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere, but why don't the amazon image links include an affiliate code? -lukem
- That's because the hosting service used by MusicBrainz is for non-profit organisations. At the moment MB isn't officially a non-profit, so using the affiliate code isn't allowed. However once we gain non-profit status, then the hosting company will allow us to use the Amazon affiliate code. - djce
Support for Subdirectories in the MusicBrainzTagger
It would be cool if it could support sub folders when you choose the dir... --anonymous
You can use drag and drop with the tagger. That should help --DonRedman
Lyrics option tied to songs in database. --anonymous
Support for Hidden Bonus Tracks
If a CD has extra-long tracks (usually the last track) which contain a large amount of silence and then a hidden / bonus track, I usually split them into 2 files: the track named on the sleeve, and the bonus track. (For example, http://musicbrainz.org/showalbum.html?albumid=39118) It would be useful if MusicBrainz could:
- identify these derived tracks, so that the appropriate tagging info could be used. Currently, they are unidentified as they are a completely different length to the originals. I am hesitant to add the TRM for the trimmed version as an alternative for the last track, as I'm not sure whether it should count as belonging to that album or not.
- this is a bit more BlueSky, I know, but it might be worth considering a metadata representation for the positions of multiple songs in releases of this sort, which could be used as a guide for splitting the track. - IMSoP
Resolve Redundant/Duplicate Albums
MusicBrainz stores a unique ID for TRM, track, artist and album. Do these IDs have a date code built into them/or are the obseleted when changes are made in the database? My thinking is: the Tagger clearly uses these codes to confirm that an audio file is already saved. It does not appear to check the server before moving these files to the saved category. If it did and if there were built-in obsolescence codes when a change is made in the server database then previously tagged files would be automatically updated. For example, currently there are redundant albums in the database (i.e. the Beatles White Album or Elton John's Yellow Brick Road). Songs from one disc are identified as belonging to several different albums (as evident by the different album names, some with disc numbers in their name). Currently I don't tag these because, though the artist and title are correct, there is confusion as to the album naming. I would be willing to tag these if I knew that the tags would be automatically updated one day when someone corrects the redundancies in the database. --anonymous
(moved here from below because it covers the same topic --DonRedman): The user should have the *option* of selecting an album where there are multiple album matches for a given track by an artist. For example, MusicBrainz frequently selects a greatest hits album (not necessarily official) or even obscure compilations of multiple artists. The user could be more accurate in identifying source album from a group of potential album sources. In my case, the user may wish to be deliberately inaccurate--selecting the original album rather than the source greatest hits album. --anonymous
If I understand this right, then this issue will be resolved by the PicardTagger. Can anybody confirm this and then move this to OldFeatureSuggestions? --DonRedman
Set Preferred Geographic Region in the Taggger
There should be a preference in the tagger for a geographic region (for example, if all my albums were bought in the US, then disregard editions of the album published in Australia). This would lead to more accurate tagging and perhaps reduce the likelihood of TrmCollisions. --anonymous
Support the Musepack Audio Format
Somewhat related to the note below this (because of Foobar2k) I would like support for the audioformat Musepack Audio Format (.mpc). Possibility of support for APEv2-tags (reading/writing) for both MP3 and MPC would also be appreciated. --anonymous
I second this proposal. Given: #Musepack is one of the best lossy codecs, #more & more people use it, especially music geeks, #the latter have many ripped cds in musepack format on their hard drives, awaiting to flood MB with precious TRMs, #Musepack uses a tagging standard, named APEV2, which is much cleaner than ID3V2, so the coding should not be too depressive, Musepack support in MB would be a very, very good idea. --MLL
Support the replaygain tag
I think Musicbrainz should write replaygain tags. I have no idea how or what you do to write them but im sure you can google it. For those who dont know, replaygain is a standard to fix the variable volumes in mp3's, I know foobar2k uses it, and it works real well. --anonymous
This might not be too smart since the volume is defined by the encoder-settings. Besides foobar2k recalculates the replaygain every time you play the song by default (if I remember correctly), it sure do calculate the values if the files doesn't have 'em. And thirdly, only foobar2k uses these tags yet. The replaygainplugin for winamp use its own tags. So there is no need to implement a field which wouldn't be of any use to most people, and most probably would be wrong for the few who uses it!
Present a List of Choices in the Tagger UI when TrmCollisions Occur
It would be a major time-saver in the MusicBrainzTagger if, when a TRM matches more than one track, I could pick the correct one without having to send it to the unidentified tab. I assume it's a user-interface safeguard not that they have to be moved at all. What would be better would be if ALL exact matches appeared in the entry, so i could radio-button the correct one. --ChozCunningham
i second this one.. major head ache... even if a 4th tab is needed or something for files whose trm matches more than 1 song... --anonymous
As it is, it would appear that no further automated tagging occurs following a trm collision (even though, for there to be a trm collision, it would seem that there are at least two matches). A context menu in the Tagger with the ability to chose one of the two trms (or none) would be very nice. --anonymous
Enhance the RelatedArtists Feature
PLEASE PLASE PLASE! add a feature similar to "people who liked this song/artist also liked..." --anonymous
- This could probably be quite easily implemented using the XML interface of www.echocloud.com --Pelpet
- That's what the RelatedArtist
s are. --RjMunro- Try audioscrobbler.com - you may be able to link up with their system to impliment? -- Kim
- this seems to be well underway and already running on the testserver. audioscrobbler specifies what kind of other music listen to as well, if you share similar tastes --G0llum
- Try audioscrobbler.com - you may be able to link up with their system to impliment? -- Kim
- That's what the RelatedArtist
Add the ability to collapse tracks from the same artist that appear on multiple releases into one single track with only one UUID
If the above was done then one side-effect would be the ability to use the tracklists of CDs you don't own as readymade playlists. For example, if you owned all of the individual albums released by a band such as Simon & Garfunkel you would be able to use one of their many Greatest Hits as a playlist to save you creating your own. Or if you owned a lot of songs from the 60s (volumes 1 through X of "Hits of the 60s" perhaps) then you may be interested in listening to "Girl Groups of the 60s" or "#1 hits of 1967" or "The Psychedelic Sounds of the 60s" or "The Songs of Burt Bacharach" etc.
Analyzing this relationship data (artist/song x appears on n compilations with artist/song z) would also probably give (yet another) metric of relatedness for songs. See RelatedArtists.
The trick with this though is that there ARE some alternate versions of songs by the same artist with identical titles (perhaps alternate mixes on different albums) and also, that the UUIDs as they stand right now also help to identify what album a track is from, which can be handy in some cases. Perhaps an additional "General Song UUID" would be better to track songs (as opposed to tracks)? -- Pipian
Suggestion: I've noticed my version of the Tagger, 0.8.5, compares both the TRM ID and the current tag info when calculating the degree of similarity between my track and the ones on the server. Maybe my track info is all screwed up, and the program tells me the song is only a little similar to the one in the server, and only if it gets the right song. This could be reduced if the comparison involved the TRM ID only. Maybe only after that has failed, the current tag info would be used to look for a match.
Daniel CSF, 20030329
Add an option to control placement of "The" in titles. For instance, "The Who" versus "Who, The" and some may prefer just "Rolling Stones", for example.
- I assume you mean into the tagger... It's easily possible given that MusicBrainz has a sortname field. The last I heard this was being added into the MusicBrainz library, so it's only a matter of time before it should get into the tagger. - ArchieB
- You may also want to harass the makers of your favourite mp3 player to support the sort the TSOP tag in ID3v2 which is designed to contain the sortname of the performer. This means you can have "Bob Marley", "Bob Marley & the Wailers" and "Ziggy Marley" listed together under M, without having to display them as "Marley, Bob", "Marley, Bob & the Wailers" and "Marley, Ziggy".
Some singles have the same name as the album. Making the metadata visible (and usable in the tagger) in some way may reduce the urge for people to tacksingle on to the end of the title. The same goes for live and instrumental albums. If people want this style for their own data then it should be an option in the tagger.
Also, there is a great singles database available from www.discogs.com and I believe that it could be accessed in much the same way as freedb.com is used now. - ObedFernandez
- I put in a feature suggestion at http://www.discogs.com to provide RDF/SOAP interfaces to their database. -- DanielOconnor
What about the ability to search on artist AND album? This would allow much greater accuracy when searching the site.
- You can do this using the "Advanced search" part of the search page (basically it's the Tagger lookup, but without the Tagger) - djce
I have not added my real email to my profile because this site doesn't seem to mask email addresses. They appear in a manner that a Spammer could harvest easily. Emails ought to be displayed in such a way that spam bots don't get valid addresses. They ought to be masked or hidden in some way. Thanx,Edward
- No-one else can see your e-mail address, unless you send a note and choose the "Reveal my e-mail address" option. In other words, the only e-mail addresses which should be visible on the site are:
- your own, when you are logged in (but no-one else can see this)
- MusicBrainz' own e-mail addresses (e.g. support, info, helpwanted)
- any other addresses which people have chosen to enter in their "bio" sections, or in moderation notes
... - djce
As a lot of people tag all the tracks from a single album at the same time, could the tagger have a button that says "all these tracks are from the same album"? Currently there is often one or two tracks per album that have been on several albums, or that have been released as singles, which the tagger often guesses wrong. This button would help prevent that.
Is it possible to support single mp3's with a cue sheet? Mix albums are always preferable in this format, and I'd like to be able to have MB correct the cue sheet.
Similarly, is it possible to have an option for MB to create a playlist for an album once it has correctly identified all the tracks.
I assume (from the donate button) that you need money to keep the project going. Have you considered a 'sponsor an improvement' scheme. I'd be willing to donate money to see the two improvements above get done. People could pledge money to particular improvements, and once a set limit was hit, they would get done. This would also let you know which improvements were the most popular.
The interface could use some tweaking. The ability to select multiple albums and do a batch command on them from the normal, non-expanded album list view has disappeared. This forces the user to go to the compact view just to do batch commands. :(
Also, we could consolidate the info/edit lines in the album details view. Right now there are way too many links when you're looking at a single album.
Finally, a really useful improvement would be to list the date of release for the album in the normal, non-expanded album list view. It would be great to have these automatically sorted by date, too.
~Tenebrous~
Another good thing would be for the interface to remember the last set state of the album listing for a users when they are logged in. So if you set an artist to a compact listing it will remain that way as long as you are logged in. This would prevent the user from having to keep setting the album listing when it's different from what the "view compact when more than X albums are listed" preference.
~Tenebrous~
Also when you are importing an album, if we could add a release at that time, it would save another step.
~Tenebrous
FreeDB stores year info for many releases, and it is surprisingly accurate. --bawjaws
But FreeDB doesn't have release date for many albums and when it does, MusicMoz doesn't get that piece of info on input. Also, we need a way to denote which record company/label released the album.
~Tenebrous~
It's important to distinguish between types of releases in terms of how available a release is. Contrast a major-label release and an indie release with a specialty release done by the band themselves in which only 1000 copies are ever made. I propose creating an extra tag or category (could be in addition to existing structure or just add this to the album/ep/etc list) called "Limited" for these specialty releases.
~Tenebrous~
It also would be nice to choose an abbreviated release selection page when importing releases from freedb. If you've done it more than 40 times, you know what each item is, yet you still have to scroll the whole page down to get to the submit button.
~Tenebrous~
I second everyting that has been said about release years. Also it should be possible to mass-import release years for the albums already in the database from freedb or amazon (but they should probably be marked as "inaccurate" or similar so that future moderators won't be confused if they see a bad release year).
/Beliuxxx
I have 2 ideas, both of which are for the tagger. First, I would like for there to be a way to not just remove a track from being analyzed by the tagger, but to totally delete it from my computer. Too often, either a downloaded mp3 or one that i have ripped myself will have errors in it, and it would be beneficial to be able to remove the track from within the tagger. Secondly, since all the tracks have a unique track ID, would it be possible to store this ID in the comment field of an ID3v1 or ID3v2 tag? As a corrallary, this info could be used to refresh my own collection to any changes that may have occured since the last time the tracks were tagged without needing to completely reanalyze the track.
--If you were to use this just for personal use, it might be beneficial to create a table (read: XML) with the TRM and a file's corresponding checksum, so that the process of refreshing a collection occurs quicker. I think putting the TRM in the comment field would be necessary only for the convenience of other users who download from you. I'm not sure if either way is better / easier, but just thought I'd throw my comment out there. -evileyetmc
A suggestion for a new search on the Advanced page: moderations in which you added a note. It's difficult to keep track of what you agreed to do when you can't search by this and the search doesn't let you plop down in the middle of all your moderations, but forces you to go to the a number and hit > to get the next seven entries or so. ~Tene
Dont know if these features have already been suggested (or already exist!)- i don't want to read the complete page as it is my first visit to this wiki... - so please drop me a short comment if they are. - (1) I'd like to start browsing by entering the artist name so i haven't to click letter by letter. - And (2): Could the .cddb file for an album be made available for download?? - FloK, 04-01-20
Don't know if this is possible or not, but can there be album art integrated into the database. I would really like to completely get rid of MusicMatch but this is the only thing holding me back.
Lyrics would be nice too. /Pelpet
I think it would be nice if the tagger could open playlist files. Then I could easily select poorly tagged files in winamp/foobar2k and export a list to the tagger.
/Pelpet
SubscribeToModerator
The following is largely addressed by the recent suggestion of SubscribeToModerator ("watch" another moderator's edits/votes):
This is more of a social / website suggestion, but when I was going through some random moderations, I saw that somebody as anal as I am had gone and done some thorough updates (fixes, not just freedb imports). It's easy to click through the user link to see all their mods, but actually what I wanted was a list of all their open mods so that I could vote for them. It's a bit of a pain to set up an advanced search for one moderator's open mods, but I was able to do so manually, and I voted for pretty much every one of them. I had some confidence in their correctness - they weren't all perfect, but all were improvements over what was already there. It's a nice reward for somebody who has obviously put more than a few minutes into correcting data, and actually takes much less time than voting on an equivalent number of random mods (most of which are album adds/imports that have already been entered anyhow).
It would be nice if individual moderator pages had a quick link to "vote on this person's moderations" that would pull up an advanced search for that person's open mods - then when you click on submit, the page refreshes with the remaining open mods. It might also be helpful to add something to the moderation faq suggesting this sort of "buddy mod".
The Edit Releases pages are awkward - it requires a minimum of three extra pages and four clicks to add a single release date to an album that has no release information. And the first time I entered release data, I didn't realized that I had to "Enter Moderations" for them to take effect (I thought that the "Submit" button had already done it). It would be much nicer if "Edit Releases" for an album with no releast info took you directly to a page where you could enter a release without having to click on "Add Release" and "Submit" - it would also be easier if the "Submit" button actually submitted any changes. dupuy
Have more ServerAccessPaths for cgi-bin/mq_2_1.pl: In particular, allow fuzzy searching rather than requiring an ID. Why? Say I want to link to something in RDF but I don't want to spend exhorbitant amounts of time looking for a TRM/MBID - or I have an automated service which *cannot* do it. This would mean that simple RDF clients like Foaf Explorer could explore MusicBrainz without having to know SOAP to discover fuzzy IDs. If (when) this is implemented, please contact me -- DanielOconnor (mailto:daniel.oconnor@gmail.com)
HAve you seen the distributed moderation system in place at urbandictionary.com ? If you add or use their data, it has a very quick and fun feature that shows you previous moderation decisions, and lets you say good, bad, indifferent to them.
It's a way of getting time-poor types like me to contribute stuff, as it becomes a nice, gentle background task and quite compelling.
Kim
Don't mess with my tags!
Ok, look, I have over 4000 mp3s I've collected over the past few years, mostly from rips of my CDs and purchased and downloaded from EMusic back in the days when you had unlimited downloads. I've very carefully tagged all the songs and developed my own tagging style which I find pleasing and consistent ('The Xs' becoming 'Xs, The' and other such anally retentive stuff mostly).
However, my style for tags is not identical to the StyleGuidelines here for MusicBrainz, and while I'd love to have all my music tagged with the MB TRM ids for unambiguity, looking up in the MB database, and for use with Audioscrobbler, I don't want all my artist/album/title tags munged into the MusicBrainz format.
I'd even be willing to make sure any new submissions to the MusicBrainz database were formatted according to the StyleGuidelines, but until the tagger can be told to only write new tag info for MB and not to overwrite existing tags, I won't be participating. (Just as an aside, Moodlogic has this option to identify tracks but not rewrite your id3 tags, although its other issues have made it pretty much worthless these days.)
kelly@9
Basically this would mean that the tagger has an option to write the MusicBrainz-ID only. If there is already a SourceForge page for the PicardTagger, you could enter a request there. --DonRedman
When adding release information, you can select every country on earth, but why aren't there "International" or "Europe"?
Martin
Any chance of support for AAC/AAC Lossless? I'm working on building up a bunch of "masters" ripped in lossless and am undecided between FLAC and AAC Lossless. I like FLAC but the other people who are ripping with me are macheads and are doing theirs to AAC Lossless. AAC Lossless has the advantage of embedding album art into the file itself (AFAIK), which would be nice to be able to put in automatically by the tagger. That aside, AAC/AAC Lossless support would be awsome.
Alan
When the tagger can't find the album based on the current ID3 info, could it look to file name/path? Although my collection is in rough shape wrt ID3s, it is very accurately sorted in the file structure, which is definitely info accessible to the tagger.
