Difference between revisions of "Proposal talk:Track Title"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
m (New page: How about a NonAlbumTrackStyle? Maybe that's a special version of TrackAttributesStyle? It should contain more information than 'normal...)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Think the description of ordering should have a verbage change. -more relevant-, To me the remix details are more relevant to the (feat. artist) Ice Cube in the second example or you would say the (feat. artist) is more relevant to the remix details being it's only for that edition. --[[User:TeleGUISE|teleGUISE]]
 
Think the description of ordering should have a verbage change. -more relevant-, To me the remix details are more relevant to the (feat. artist) Ice Cube in the second example or you would say the (feat. artist) is more relevant to the remix details being it's only for that edition. --[[User:TeleGUISE|teleGUISE]]
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
 +
Tracks that are part of a multi-track (non-Classical) suite seem to be painfully absent from this guideline. [[User:Torc|Torc]] 10:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:32, 18 November 2010

How about a NonAlbumTrackStyle? Maybe that's a special version of TrackAttributesStyle? It should contain more information than 'normal' tracks to distinguish different versions of tracks. --Zout

Think the description of ordering should have a verbage change. -more relevant-, To me the remix details are more relevant to the (feat. artist) Ice Cube in the second example or you would say the (feat. artist) is more relevant to the remix details being it's only for that edition. --teleGUISE




Tracks that are part of a multi-track (non-Classical) suite seem to be painfully absent from this guideline. Torc 10:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)