Difference between revisions of "Proposals"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added RFC-115)
Line 1,400: Line 1,400:
| <!-- Trac ticket --> [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/5605 5605] [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/4615 4615] [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/3942 3942]
| <!-- Trac ticket --> [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/5605 5605] [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/4615 4615] [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/3942 3942]
| <!-- Status --> RFV
| <!-- Status --> RFV
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008700.html RFC]
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008700.html RFC] [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008802.html RFC2]
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-01
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-01, 2010-03-08
| <!-- RFV --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008791.html RFV]
| <!-- RFV --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008791.html RFV1]
| <!-- RFV Date --> 2010-03-08
| <!-- RFV Date --> 2010-03-08, ?
| <!-- Passage Date --> 2010-03-10
| <!-- Passage Date -->
|-
|-
| <h4 style='display: none'>RFC-99: Also Known As</h4>
| <h4 style='display: none'>RFC-99: Also Known As</h4>

Revision as of 00:05, 9 March 2010

Proposals

Changes to MusicBrainz are agreed to using this proposal process.

The process is simple. Someone has an idea, either for something new, or for a change to how something existing is done. After discussion of the idea has taken place, one person takes control of the idea. This person is then known as the Idea Champion for that proposal. The Idea Champion has the responsibility for moving the idea from a vague concept to a clear proposal, then working for Style Council passage of the proposal.

Though it is somewhat dated, Turning Your Ideas into Reality is well worth a read.

Definitions

Idea Champion
The person who currently is handling a proposal.
Style Council
Any members of the Style mailing list who wish to take part in discussion of a proposal. There is no formal membership to the style council. If you are an interested contributor to MusicBrainz and reasonably well informed about existing StyleGuidelines, MusicBrainz development, and the general culture of the project, you are welcome to subscribe to the Style mailing list and join the discussions. Also see the history of the Style Council.

Process for Idea Champions

  1. Come up with an idea for something new or something that should be changed. While somewhat out of date, the points raised on this former checklist for style changes are still worth consideration as part of your proposal.
  2. Create a new wikipage for the proposal. This should be located at http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:(you)/(proposal name).
    • The proposal template should be at the top of the page:
{{Template:proposal
|proposal=
|discussion=
|champion=
|rfc=
|rfv=
|status=
|ar=
|style=
|trac=
}}
  1. proposal, rfc, rfv, status: Leave these blank
    discussion: A link to the initial discussion (IRC, forums, or style list) of an idea.
    champion: You.
    ar: If your proposal changes or adds an Advanced Relationship, then "true", otherwise leave the value blank.
    style: If your proposal changes or adds a style guideline, then "true", otherwise leave the value blank.
    trac: The trac ticket number for your proposal.
  2. Send an RFC announcement to the style list.
    • The RFC should have "RFC:" at the beginning of the subject line.
    • The body of the email should contain:
    1. The expected expiration date for the RFC.
    2. A brief summary of the proposal.
    3. A link to the proposal's wikipage.
    4. Links to any previous discussion (IRC, style list, users list, forums, etc) which led to the proposal.
  3. During the period where the RFC is active, discussion of it will occur on the style list.
    • Anyone can change the proposal's wikipage, though it is encouraged that any changes which go beyond minor formatting, spelling, or example changes should be left to the Idea Champion.
    • If you are not the Idea Champion, and you have sufficient disagreement with the proposal that you feel an entirely different proposal needs to be created, a new proposal wikipage should be created, for which you would become that proposal's Idea Champion. Do not rewrite the original proposal wikipage and attempt to take over the idea from the original Idea Champion!
    • Where there is disagreement, the Idea Champion should work to find consensus.
    • On minor points, the Idea Champion maintains control of the proposal. However, for the Idea Champion, you ignore dissent at the risk of the proposal - disagreement can easily become vetos during the RFV period.
    • If discussion on an RFC is still ongoing, and there is not yet agreement that the proposal is ready to pass, the RFC period may be extended. The RFC period only defines a minimum, not a maximum, time period for debate.
  4. When the RFC's initial period has expired, the Idea Champion (or a Style Leader) will send out an RFV for the proposal.
    • The RFV email should have "RFV:" at the beginning of the subject line.
    • The body of the email should contain:
    1. The expected passage date for the RFV.
    2. A brief summary of the proposal, including a summary of any changes which have been made since the RFC.
    3. A link to the proposal's wikipage.
  5. During the RFV period, any member of the style council may veto the RFV. However, vetos must have merit (no vetos simply because "I don't like this proposal"). Vetos must be publicly cast, on the style list, and should detail what problems are believed to remain in the RFV, and what changes could be made such that the veto would be cleared. These suggested changes must be reasonable; if the changes would entail a rewrite, or rethink, of the proposal itself, then a counter-proposal wikipage should be created, and the decision as to which proposal will pass should be left to the style council.
    • If an RFV receives a veto, the proposal reverts to an RFC. There is no minimum time period at this point, but no new RFV should be attempted until the problems raised in any vetos have been discussed and/or addressed. A proposal may revert to an RFC, or have replacement RFCs sent, as many times as is needed.
  6. If the end of the RFV period is reached, and no vetos have been cast, then the proposal has passed. The Idea Champion is now responsible for ensuring that the changes described by the proposal are enacted (changing wiki pages, entering edits, creating trac or jira tickets, etc.). This includes remembering to remove the proposal template from the proposal's wikipage!

Time Periods

  • RFC: 7 days
  • RFV: 2 days

Style Leaders

Style Elder

Definitions

RFC (Request for Change)
The initial discussion period for any proposal
RFV (Request for Veto)
The decision period for any proposal
Style Leader
They guide the process and keep it from getting stuck. If the council cannot reach consensus they will make a decision. This position was previously called "secretary".
Style Elder
The benevolent dictator of MusicBrainz StyleIssues. If the process goes off the rails, or if someone disputes the style leaders' decisions, the elder steps in.

Special Procedures

Has Cover Art At Relationship Type, Has Lyrics At Relationship Type, and Has Score At Relationship Type each only allow links to whitelisted sites. To add any site to the whitelist for any one of these advanced relationships, the following additional procedure must be followed.

  1. Add the site to the list on the relevant page for the AR.
  2. Using the normal proposal process, send a RFC requesting the addition of the site.
    • The RFC should be limited to covering only 1 site.
    • Rhe RFC must provide rationale and evidence for why the site can reasonably be believed to have permission to contain the content to which we would be linking.
  3. The Style Council will then make sure that the site itself is legal; that it has a right/license/whatever to store the content (lyrics/scores/cover art) which which the relationships would be link.
    • If any situation arises where "legal" is questionable depending on local laws, MusicBrainz is based in California, so US/California law wins.
  4. Once the RFV has passed, permission must be obtained, in writing (email is fine), from the site which would be added to the whitelist.
    • This permission may be requested prior to the passage of the RFV.

Only when permission has been received and a RFV has passed may the site be added as a whitelisted site for the applicable relationship type(s).

Current Proposals

Next New Proposal Number

Next new proposal number: 201

Proposal numbers 112 - 200 have been pre-reserved for RFCs to fill in holes in the guidelines and documentation.

March 2010 Proposal Cleanup

NOTE: Effective March 24, 2010, any proposal which has no Champion will be closed, including any associated proposal pages and trac tickets! If you do not want to see one of these proposals die, then adopt it today, then make it happen!

Style Proposals

Categorized as Category:Proposed Style.

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-1: AudioBook Style

RFC-1

AudioBook Style None: Caution! New guideline 2147 Abandoned

RFC-7: Capitalization Standard Spanish

RFC-7

Capitalization Standard Spanish Toni Panadès (t0n3t) and reosarevok New guideline 5635 RFC RFC 2010-03-05 2010-03-12 2010-03-14

RFC-8: Capitalization Standard Swedish

RFC-8

Capitalization Standard Swedish None: Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-9: Capitalization Standard Turkish

RFC-9

Capitalization Standard Turkish Yasar Suleyman Kocak New guideline In development

RFC-10: Capitalization Standard Vietnamese (alternate)

RFC-10

Capitalization Standard Vietnamese (alternate) None: (was jesus2099) Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-19: Game Soundtrack Style

RFC-19

Game Soundtrack Style BrianFreud New guideline 2146 Discussion

RFC-20: Instrumental Style

RFC-20

Instrumental Style None: Caution! ETI style for instrumental tracks 2142 Inactive original RFC 2006-04-20

RFC-25: Medley Style

RFC-25

Medley Style None: Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-27: Multi-Track Movement Style

RFC-27

Multi-Track Movement Style None: Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-28: Musical Soundtrack Style

RFC-28

Musical Soundtrack Style BrianFreud New guideline 2146 Discussion Related thread

RFC-42: Release Artist Style

RFC-42

Release Artist Style navap New guideline 2143

RFC-43: Release Country Style

RFC-43

Release Country Style (additional page) Jacobbrett Release events 2145 Discussion

RFC-46: Release Region Style

RFC-46

Release Region Style None: Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-47: Release Title

RFC-47

Release Title BrianFreud New guideline RFC RFC 2010-03-06 2010-03-13 2010-03-15

RFC-53: Soundtrack Style

RFC-53

Soundtrack Style BrianFreud New guideline 2146 Discussion

RFC-54: Soundtrack Title Style

RFC-54

Soundtrack Title Style BrianFreud New guideline 2146 Discussion

RFC-61: Track Title Style

RFC-61

Track Title Style warp Naming of track titles In development

RFC-62: Untitled Release Style

RFC-62

Untitled Release Style None: (was Bogdanb) Caution! New guideline Abandoned?

RFC-64: Release Event Style

RFC-64

Release Event Style Jacobbrett Release events Discussion

RFC-66: User Tags Standards

RFC-66

User Tags Standards None: Caution! New guideline, folksonomy Abandoned?

RFC-67: Revised Classical Style Guide (aka CSGv2)

RFC-67

Revised Classical Style Guide (aka CSGv2) BrianFreud Rewrites all of CSG 4426 RFC, On hold pending NGS release RFC 2009-02-15

RFC-82: Part Number Style rewrite

RFC-82

Part Number Style rewrite BrianFreud Part Number Style 5066 On hold pending RFC-61

RFC-101: Capitalization Standard Catalan

RFC-101

Capitalization Standard Catalan Toni Panadès (t0n3t) New guideline None RFC RFC 2010-03-05 2010-03-12 2010-03-14

RFC-109: Release Groups

RFC-109

Release Groups None: Caution! New guideline None Abandoned?

Advanced Relationship Proposals

Categorized as Category:Proposed Advanced Relationship Type.

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-2: Has Score At relationship

RFC-2

Has Score At relationship mbuser838171846981 New release-URL AR
New track-URL AR
5634 Passed, to be implemented RFC 2010-02-20 RFV 2010-03-01 2010-03-03

RFC-4: Redesign of the Vocal Relationship Attribute

RFC-4

Redesign of the Vocal Relationship Attribute None: Caution! AR modification 1140 Discussion

RFC-18: Engineer Relationship Type

RFC-18

Engineer Relationship Type Chris B New artist-release AR
New artist-track AR
3565 Passed but needs server support for 3-element ARs, see RFC-91 ? 2007-05-22 RFV RFV 2008-02-01 2008-03-02

RFC-21: Linking Different Artist Names

RFC-21

Linking Different Artist Names None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned? ? ? ? ?

RFC-26: Miscellaneous Production Relationship Type/Artwork

RFC-26

Miscellaneous Production Relationship Type/Artwork None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned? ? ? ? ?

RFC-29: Narrator Relationship Type

RFC-29

Narrator Relationship Type None: Caution! New vocal role 1368 Abandoned? ? ? ? ?

RFC-35: Part Of Series Relationship Type

RFC-35

Part Of Series Relationship Type voiceinsideyou New release-release, or RG-RG, AR ? Discussion

RFC-39: Reader Relationship Type

RFC-39

Reader Relationship Type None: Caution! New vocal role 1370 Abandoned? ? ? ? ?

RFC-52: Single From Album Relationship Type

RFC-52

Single From Album Relationship Type BrianFreud New release-track AR In development

RFC-55: Speaker Relationship Type

RFC-55

Speaker Relationship Type None: Caution! New vocal role 1731 Abandoned? ? ? ? ?

RFC-68: Add Has News Coverage AR

RFC-68

Add Has News Coverage AR ruoak New release-URL AR 5636 RFC RFC 2010-02-28 2010-03-07 (postponed; discussion ongoing) 2010-03-??

RFC-69: Defining instruments and vocals for members of bands

RFC-69

Defining instruments and vocals for members of bands None: Caution! Artist-artist AR enhancement 1141 Abandoned?

RFC-70: Add attribute 'translated' to Lyricist Relationship Type

RFC-70

Add attribute 'translated' to Lyricist Relationship Type (related attribute page) zout Artist-Track and Artist-Release AR enhancement 4424 Passed, to be implemented RFC3 RFC4 2010-02-27 RFV 2010-03-06 2010-03-08

RFC-74: "Sampled speech" as AR for tracks

RFC-74

"Sampled speech" as AR for tracks None: Caution! ? 3032 Abandoned?

RFC-82: Resolve FoundingMemberDatesQuestion

RFC-82

Resolve FoundingMemberDatesQuestion BrianFreud artist-artist AR 1009 RFV RFC 2010-03-01 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10

RFC-83: Add track-url Wikipedia AR

RFC-83

Add track-url Wikipedia AR BrianFreud New track-URL AR 3852 In development

RFC-84: Add 'provides discographic information about' AR

RFC-84

Add 'provides discographic information about' AR BrianFreud New track-URL AR 3734 In development

RFC-85: Adding vocal attribute to Arranger AR

RFC-85

Adding vocal attribute to Arranger AR Chris B New artist-release AR
New artist-track AR
3564 MBS-488 Passed, Waiting for implementation RFV 2008-01-08 2008-01-??

RFC-86: Add Release-Track Relationship for pre-gap tracks

RFC-86

Add Release-Track Relationship for pre-gap tracks None: Caution! New track-release AR 4235 On hold until after NGS is released

RFC-87: Add 'is a project of' AR

RFC-87

Add 'is a project of' AR None: Caution! New artist-artist AR 882, #s 3 and 4 Abandoned?

RFC-88: Add microblog/Twitter AR

RFC-88

Add microblog/Twitter AR Andrew John Hughes New artist-URL AR
New label-URL AR
5330 Abandoned?

RFC-89: Add Facebook AR

RFC-89

Add Facebook AR Andrew John Hughes New artist-URL AR
New label-URL AR
5329 Abandoned?

RFC-90: Has Lyrics At Extension

RFC-90

Has Lyrics At Extension BrianFreud New artist-URL AR 5637 RFV RFC 2010-02-28 RFV 2010-03-07 2010-03-09

RFC-91: Fix Production Relationship Class

RFC-91

Fix Production Relationship Class (aka: convert the current Miscellaneous Production and Engineer Relationship Types to Relationship Classes, fix/implement the unimplemented but already-passed specific Engineer Relationship types, and fix Programming Relationship Type) BrianFreud Fixes problems within Production Relationship Class, also implements RFC-18 and RFC-85 RFV RFC 2010-02-28 RFV 2010-03-07 2010-03-09

RFC-92: Create three new AR Classes, remove 3 existing AR Classes, move Affiliate RC, merge 2 existing AR Types

RFC-92

Create three new AR Classes, remove 3 existing AR Classes, move Affiliate RC, merge 2 existing AR Types BrianFreud Reorganization of 4 Relationship Classes, merge 2 Relationship Types RFV RFC 2010-02-28 RFV 2010-03-07 2010-03-09

RFC-94: Decommission Label Relationship Class

RFC-94

Decommission Label Relationship Class BrianFreud Removes 1 Relationship Class RFV RFC 2010-03-01 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10

RFC-95: Add Live Journal

RFC-95

Add Live Journal None: Caution! New artist-URL AR Abandoned?

RFC-96: AR documentation cleanup

RFC-96

AR documentation cleanup BrianFreud AR documentation cleanup RFV RFC 2010-03-01 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10

RFC-97: Expanded Samples Relationship Type

RFC-97

Expanded Samples Relationship Type None: Caution! AR enhancement Abandoned?

RFC-98: Allow Instrument Attribute for Members of a Band

RFC-98

Allow Instrument Attribute for Members of a Band None: Caution! AR enhancement Abandoned?

RFC-102: Add attribute 'translated' to Librettist Relationship Type

RFC-102

Add attribute 'translated' to Librettist Relationship Type (related attribute page) BrianFreud AR enhancement RFC RFC 2010-03-06 2010-03-13 2010-03-15

RFC-103: Add Changed Name To AR

RFC-103

Add Changed Name To AR None: Caution! New artist-artist AR Discussion died (this RFC has been independently attempted multiple times) one RFC, one RFC, others 2007-05, 2008-02-09, others

RFC-104: Expansion of the Librettist Relationship Type

RFC-104

Expansion of the Librettist Relationship Type BrianFreud New track-artist AR Discussion RFC 2008-02-09

RFC-106: Conductor AR Changes

RFC-106

Conductor AR Changes None: (was luks) Caution! Conductor and Chorus Master Relationship Types modification Abandoned? RFC 2007-05-03

RFC-110: Same Artist With Different Names Suggestion

RFC-110

Same Artist With Different Names Suggestion None: Caution! AR style guideline changes Abandoned?

RFC-111: Writer Relationship Type

RFC-111

Writer Relationship Type None: Caution! New AR Abandoned?

Other Proposals

Categorized as Category:Proposal.

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-3: Advanced Entity

RFC-3

Advanced Entity None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-5: Album Rework

RFC-5

Album Rework None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-6: Artist Type Project

RFC-6

Artist Type Project None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-11: Change Default Data Quality Proposal

RFC-11

Change Default Data Quality Proposal (Data) BrianFreud Voting, Quality, and Edit expiration On hold until post-NGS, when edit/voting system is given specific attention pre-RFC RFC 2007-06-19

RFC-15: Disentangle Interfaces From Schema

RFC-15

Disentangle Interfaces From Schema None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-16: Display Inheritance

RFC-16

Display Inheritance None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-17: Distributed MusicBrainz

RFC-17

Distributed MusicBrainz None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-24: Location Proposal

RFC-24

Location Proposal BrianFreud New entity In development, Post-NGS

RFC-30: Add Descarga cat #s field

RFC-30

Add Descarga cat #s field None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-31: Subscribe to release

RFC-31

Subscribe to release None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-32: Separately identify hidden tracks

RFC-32

Separately identify hidden tracks None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-33: Add support for displaying and editing related artists

RFC-33

Add support for displaying and editing related artists None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-34: Add support to become an open source AccurateRip replacement

RFC-34

Add support to become an open source AccurateRip replacement None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-36: Performance Restructuring Proposal

RFC-36

Performance Restructuring Proposal None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-37: Performances And Recordings Proposal

RFC-37

Performances And Recordings Proposal BrianFreud New entity In development, post-NGS

RFC-40: Reason Not To Treat DVD As CD

RFC-40

Reason Not To Treat DVD As CD None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-44: Release Data Set

RFC-44

Release Data Set None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-48: Release Transliteration And Translation

RFC-48

Release Transliteration And Translation None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-49: Release Type Restructuring Proposal

RFC-49

Release Type Restructuring Proposal BrianFreud ? 1372 In development

RFC-50: Removing the clutter

RFC-50

Removing the clutter None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-57: Make a DAML+OIL ontology for music

RFC-57

Make a DAML+OIL ontology for music None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-58: Public Namespace URIs

RFC-58

Public Namespace URIs None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-59: Music Ontology (MO) project

RFC-59

Music Ontology (MO) project None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-60: Track Grouping

RFC-60

Track Grouping None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-63: Updating Subscription Mails

RFC-63

Updating Subscription Mails None: Caution! ? ? Discussion

RFC-65: Voting Motivations

RFC-65

Voting Motivations None: Caution! ? ? Abandoned?

RFC-71: NGS: Groups and Gender

RFC-71

NGS: Groups and Gender BrianFreud NGS development MBS-450 RFV RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10

RFC-72: NGS: Alternate Genders

RFC-72

NGS: Alternate Genders BrianFreud NGS development MBS-344 RFV RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-03 2010-03-05

RFC-75: Add release format: VHS

RFC-75

Add release format: VHS BrianFreud New release format 5605 Abandoned, see RFC-93

RFC-76: Add release format: VCD

RFC-76

Add release format: VCD BrianFreud New release format 4615 Abandoned, see RFC-93

RFC-77: Add release format: SVCD

RFC-77

Add release format: SVCD BrianFreud New release format 4615 Abandoned, see RFC-93

RFC-78: Add release format: 7" vinyl

RFC-78

Add release format: 7" vinyl Per Øyvind Øygard (Wizzcat) New release format/format+format attribute 3941 Discussion

RFC-79: Add release format: 10" vinyl

RFC-79

Add release format: 10" vinyl Per Øyvind Øygard (Wizzcat) New release format/format+format attribute 3941 Discussion

RFC-80: Add release format: 12" vinyl

RFC-80

Add release format: 12" vinyl Per Øyvind Øygard (Wizzcat) New release format/format+format attribute 3941 Discussion

RFC-81: Add release format: HDCD

RFC-81

Add release format: HDCD BrianFreud New release format 3942 Abandoned, see RFC-93

RFC-93: Add release formats: VHS, VCD, SVCD, Betamax, HDCD, USB Flash Drive, slotMusic

RFC-93

Add release formats: VHS, VCD, SVCD, Betamax, HDCD, USB Flash Drive, slotMusic BrianFreud New release formats, would close RFC-75, RFC-76, RFC-77, RFC-81, and address some unknown fields on Release Format. 5605 4615 3942 RFV RFC RFC2 2010-03-01, 2010-03-08 RFV1 2010-03-08, ?

RFC-99: Also Known As

RFC-99

Also Known As None: Caution! ? Abandoned?

RFC-100: Rename Legal Name to Birth Name

RFC-100

Rename Legal Name to Birth Name None: Caution! ? Abandoned?

RFC-105: New Release Status: "Upcoming"

RFC-105

New Release Status: "Upcoming" None: Caution! Unreleased releases Abandoned? RFC 2007-04-14

RFC-108: Add release format: Universal Media Disc (UMD)

RFC-108

Add release format: Universal Media Disc (UMD) BrianFreud New release format RFC original RFC current RFC 2010-03-06 2010-03-13 2010-03-15

Pre-Reserved RFCs for cleaning up documentation and guidelines

These are all official entities, relationships, guidelines, or other things which have some minor element which is missing. Most are only a sentence or two, but need an RFC to be made official; this table lists those, and pre-reserves RFC numbers for these future RFCs. As these are intended to be truly short RFCs of only a sentence or two (in almost all cases), most won't actually have proposal pages, only proposal emails.

RFC Number Wikipage Hole to be filled Champion RFC email RFC date RFV date Pass date
RFC-112 Arranger Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-113 Arranger Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-114 Composer Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields User:davitof RFC 2010-03-07 2010-03-14 2010-03-16
RFC-115 Composer Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields User:davitof RFC 2010-03-08 2010-03-15 2010-03-17
RFC-116 Instrumentator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-117 Instrumentator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-118 Label Distribution Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-119 Label Distribution Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-120 Librettist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the additional attribute
RFC-121 Librettist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-122 Librettist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-123 Lyricist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-124 Lyricist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-125 Orchestrator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-126 Orchestrator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-127 Orchestra Relationship Type Guideline for use of the additional attribute
RFC-128 Orchestra Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-129 Orchestra Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-130 Orchestrator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the begin date fields
RFC-131 Orchestrator Relationship Type Guideline for use of the end date fields
RFC-132 Samples Artist Relationship Type Guideline for use of the additional attribute
RFC-133 Has Cover Art At Relationship Type Entire page needs to be written (this one needs a proposal page)
RFC-134 IBDb Relationship Type Entire page needs to be written (this one needs a proposal page)
RFC-135 IOBdbb Relationship Type Entire page needs to be written (this one needs a proposal page)
RFC-136 (Not used yet)
RFC-137 (Not used yet)
RFC-138 (Not used yet)
RFC-139 (Not used yet)
RFC-140 (Not used yet)
RFC-141 (Not used yet)
RFC-142 (Not used yet)
RFC-143 (Not used yet)
RFC-144 (Not used yet)
RFC-145 (Not used yet)
RFC-146 (Not used yet)
RFC-147 (Not used yet)
RFC-148 (Not used yet)
RFC-149 (Not used yet)
RFC-150 (Not used yet)
RFC-151 (Not used yet)
RFC-152 (Not used yet)
RFC-153 (Not used yet)
RFC-154 (Not used yet)
RFC-155 (Not used yet)
RFC-156 (Not used yet)
RFC-157 (Not used yet)
RFC-158 (Not used yet)
RFC-159 (Not used yet)
RFC-160 (Not used yet)
RFC-161 (Not used yet)
RFC-162 (Not used yet)
RFC-163 (Not used yet)
RFC-164 (Not used yet)
RFC-165 (Not used yet)
RFC-166 (Not used yet)
RFC-167 (Not used yet)
RFC-168 (Not used yet)
RFC-169 (Not used yet)
RFC-170 (Not used yet)
RFC-171 (Not used yet)
RFC-172 (Not used yet)
RFC-173 (Not used yet)
RFC-174 (Not used yet)
RFC-175 (Not used yet)
RFC-176 (Not used yet)
RFC-177 (Not used yet)
RFC-178 (Not used yet)
RFC-179 (Not used yet)
RFC-180 (Not used yet)
RFC-181 (Not used yet)
RFC-182 (Not used yet)
RFC-183 (Not used yet)
RFC-184 (Not used yet)
RFC-185 (Not used yet)
RFC-186 (Not used yet)
RFC-187 (Not used yet)
RFC-188 (Not used yet)
RFC-189 (Not used yet)
RFC-190 (Not used yet)
RFC-191 (Not used yet)
RFC-192 (Not used yet)
RFC-193 (Not used yet)
RFC-194 (Not used yet)
RFC-195 (Not used yet)
RFC-196 (Not used yet)
RFC-197 (Not used yet)
RFC-198 (Not used yet)
RFC-199 (Not used yet)
RFC-200 (Not used yet)

Fodder for Future Proposals