Difference between revisions of "Relationship Editor"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
(response to Brian's comment + deletion of obsolete parts of my comments (Imported from MoinMoin))
m (Bot: Fixing double redirect to Editor#Relationship editors)
(21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Relationship Editors=
#REDIRECT [[Editor#Relationship editors]]
RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s are users of [[MusicBrainz]] who have the permission to change [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s and [[Advanced Relationship Attribute|AdvancedRelationshipAttribute]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s and to add new ones.
The ideal process to get such a change done is:
# propose the change on the [[Users Mailing List|UsersMailingList]]
# If you get some positive feedback, 
## For an existing type add the proposal to the discussion section of the existing relationship type page.
## For a new type write a full proposal on a page named like this SomethingRelationshipType.
# Propose the change to the [[Style Mailing List|StyleMailingList]]. If you get consensus there, the change will be implemented.
Current RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s are:
* [[User:Dupuy|AlexanderDupuy]] (dupuy)
* [[User:DaveEvans|DaveEvans]] (djce)
* [[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]] (donredman)
* [[User:LukasLalinsky|LukasLalinsky]] (lukz)
* [[User:mo|mo]] (mo)
* [[User:RobertKaye|RobertKaye]] (rob)
* [[User:WolfSong|WolfSong]] (wolfsong)
Perhaps the term [[Relationship Type Editor|RelationshipTypeEditor]] (although there are also relationship ''attributes'') might be better than this one? [[User:Dupuy|@alex]]
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Yes you are right, [[Relationship Type Editor|RelationshipTypeEditor]] would be more correct. If you want to fix this, go ahead. I for myself think that RelationshipEditor is ok enough. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]]
"Editor" would tend to imply that the RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s are the proposers of change, in the way we use the term "Editor" elsewhere.  Based on the above description, where the general population proposes changes/additions, and the RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s then eventually become the ones to implement such changes, perhaps "[[Relationship Edit Implementor|RelationshipEditImplementor]]" would be more correct? -- [[Brian Schweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 03:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Well, as these are a subset (or subclass) of Editors, and by analogy with [[Auto-Editor|AutoEditor]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s (and the more recent [[Transclusion Editor|TransclusionEditor]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s), I now feel the term is fine as it is.  [[User:Dupuy|@alex]]
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] [[Category:Terminology]] [[Category:Advanced Relationships]]

Latest revision as of 03:51, 19 September 2012