|
|
| (26 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | =Relationship Editors=
| + | #REDIRECT [[Editor#Relationship editors]] |
| − | | |
| − | RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s are users of [[MusicBrainz]] who have the permission to change [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s, [[Advanced Relationship Attribute|AdvancedRelationshipAttribute]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s and to add new ones.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The ideal process to get such a change done is:
| |
| − | # propose the change on the [[Users Mailing List|UsersMailingList]] | |
| − | # If you get some positive feedback,
| |
| − | ## For an existing type add the proposal to the discussion section of the existing relationship type page.
| |
| − | ## For a new type write a full proposal on a page named like this SomethingRelationshipType.
| |
| − | | |
| − | # Propose the change to the [[Style Mailing List|StyleMailingList]]. If you get consensus there, the change will be implemented. | |
| − | | |
| − | Current RelationshipEditor<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s are:
| |
| − | * [[Alexander Dupuy|AlexanderDupuy]] (dupuy)
| |
| − | * [[User:DaveEvans|DaveEvans]] (djce)
| |
| − | * [[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]] (donredman)
| |
| − | * [[User:LukasLalinsky|LukasLalinsky]] (lukz)
| |
| − | * [[User:mo|mo]] (mo)
| |
| − | * [[User:RobertKaye|RobertKaye]] (rob)
| |
| − | * [[User:Shepard|Shepard]] (Shepard)
| |
| − | * [[User:WolfSong|WolfSong]] (wolfsong)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − | | |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Discussion==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Perhaps the term [[Relationship Type Editor|RelationshipTypeEditor]] (although there are also relationship ''attributes'') might be better than this one? Or [[Link Type Editor|LinkTypeEditor]]? Currently, "link editor" is probably the most common usage, although the site actually says "link moderator".
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[User:Dupuy|@alex]]
| |
| − | <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">"Link" is [[Bad Terminology|BadTerminology]]. But, yes you are right, [[Relationship Type Editor|RelationshipTypeEditor]] would be more correct. If you want to fix this, go ahead. I for myself think that RelationshipEditor is ok enough. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]]
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:To Be Reviewed]] [[Category:Terminology]] [[Category:Advanced Relationships]]
| |
