Release/Catalog Number: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
< Release
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Imported from MoinMoin)) |
(save discussion (Imported from MoinMoin)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Placeholder |
Placeholder |
||
==Discussion== |
|||
[[User:ClutchEr2|ClutchEr2]] [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2005-June/021163.html reports] that very recent CDs do not have a [[Catalog Number|CatalogNumber]]. Instead they use the [[Barcode|BarCode]] without the trailing zero and 13th check digit number. |
|||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">This is only partly true as far as I can tell. A lot of (small) labels still use internal catalog numbering, and I've also seen some labels using a smaller part of the barcode. Anyhow, this should be moved out from this page, as it pertains to ReleaseCatalogNumber, not to [[Label Code|LabelCode]]. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 19:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
</ul> |
|||
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] |
[[Category:To Be Reviewed]] |
||
Revision as of 11:52, 22 March 2007
Placeholder
Discussion
ClutchEr2 reports that very recent CDs do not have a CatalogNumber. Instead they use the BarCode without the trailing zero and 13th check digit number.
- This is only partly true as far as I can tell. A lot of (small) labels still use internal catalog numbering, and I've also seen some labels using a smaller part of the barcode. Anyhow, this should be moved out from this page, as it pertains to ReleaseCatalogNumber, not to LabelCode. -- dmppanda 19:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
