Search results

'''This is a change proposal for [[Style/Recording and release group titles/Volume numbers]], not an official guideline!''' ...apply to [[Release#Title|Release Titles]], which should reflect the actual release.

...|recordings]], and their associated [[Release Group|release groups]] and [[Release|releases]]. ...dience recordings, should follow the ''Release Group'' rules below for the release title.

...ups all objects that represent this aspect. Currently there are three such groups: [[Object Model/Artist Group|/ArtistGroup]], [[Object Model/Album Group|/Al ** [[Object Model/Release Artist Object|/ReleaseArtistObject]]

hawke_1 offers an interesting alternative idea, which I will not further consider in the Let's start with a simple example: http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=6526

...[MusicBrainz Philosophy|MusicBrainzPhilosophy]] of [[What Defines A Unique Release|WhatDefinesAUniqueRelease]]. ...is proposed in [[Release Groups|ReleaseGroups]]. An album is there called release. But I think this is not what the music industry calls it.

This guideline applies to live [[Release|releases]], [[Release Group|release groups]], and [[Recording|recordings]]. ...ial live releases, should follow the ''Release Group'' rules below for the release title.

About this last part: while I understand this in general, some of the groups on last.fm dedicated to a single artist are outstanding, with nice descript <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Please note that I was talking about *groups* ([http://www.last.fm/group/John_Doe http://www.last.fm/group/John_Doe]) pa

When entering a new release into MusicBrainz, the titles should be normalized by following these guidel ...e multiple titles. Use a colon “: ” to separate subtitles, unless there is alternative dividing punctuation in the title that can be used instead. Use a comma “

...nd is to be able to assign multiple artists to a given recording, release, release group, etc. ...requently used" artist credit when doing a lookup for an artist in the add release wizard.

...change how an artist is credited on a release or track when you enter that release. There is usually no need to add a new artist to the database if the artis ...n Miller Orchestra]] doesn't have an article on their official name (but [[release:5b45204b-5de5-4192-a416-fd73dd1e2ca2|In the Nutcracker Mood]] is credited t

==Release - Release relationship types== ...te: ''If it is not clear what the "original" language is, e.g. if the same release is released in multiple countries/multiple languages, then do not make "tra

...seHandlingPhilosophy]] (my first try) and steadily developed my ideas in [[Release Data Set|ReleaseDataSet]]. But now I think I got the final idea. So here's ===Release===

When entering a new release into MusicBrainz, the titles should be normalized by following these guidel Additional information on a [[Release|release]] or [[Track|track]] name that is '''not''' part of its main title, but int

...med releases. Note however that this here is different thant the [[Release Groups|ReleaseGroups]] proposal. ...where things can be any other the existing data we keep, e.g. contributor, release, track. Also there will be new "things", e.g. URL, and maybe we should eve

*kepstin has been working on an alternative front end http://mbjs.kepstin.ca/. Source code repository at: https://githu **Proposal: Just release groups

Aliases are alternative names for all types of [[MusicBrainz_Entity|MusicBrainz entities]]. There i ...st]]s, [[event]]s, [[label]]s, [[place]]s, [[recording]]s, [[release]]s, [[release group]]s, [[series]] and [[work]]s, whereas only privileged users may add a

MusicBrainzi kontekstis on pealkiri [[Release|väljalase]]tel (albumitel, kogumikel, singlitel, …), [[Recording|salvest # Pealkirjas algab reeglina ainult esimene sõna suure tähega: „[[release:37769b9d-1f8a-46e0-aba8-838e06b70d29|Ilus maa]]”

==Subscribe to this release== ...ld for Compilations by Various Artist and if you only want to subsribe one release by an artist and not the whole "discography". --anonymous

...I really see 'dumb' alphabetical sorting as the only realistic and usable alternative with optional exclusions of articles and similar with added exceptions base ...never liked this sorting scheme. I used to work in record store retail and groups with a members name were always sorted by the sort name of the member. So D