Style/Artist/With multiple names: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
< Style‎ | Artist
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (copying before moving)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{official style guideline}}
{{Official style}}
'''''This guideline is part of [[Advanced Relationship Style]].'''''


Some musicians perform using an "alias" (not to be confused with the MusicBrainz term, "[[Artist Alias|artist alias]]") which is different from their "real-life" name. The reasons for that vary - usually marketing, or to hide their actual identity (as to workaround legal issues when they signed exclusive contracts), etc...
{| width="100%"
| style="border:0;" |
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="clear: {{{clear|right}}}; margin-bottom: .5em; float: right; padding: .5em 0 .8em 1.4em; background: none; width: {{{width|{{{1|auto}}}}}};" {{#if:{{{limit|}}}|class="toclimit-{{{limit}}}"}}
| {{AdvancedRelationshipNavigation}}
|}
|}


In MusicBrainz, we refer to such monikers as [[Performance Name|performance names]], as opposed to [[Legal Name|legal names]].
Some musicians perform using an "alias" (not to be confused with the MusicBrainz term, "[[Artist Alias|artist alias]]") which is different from their "real-life" name. The reasons for that vary - usually marketing, or to hide their actual identity (as to workaround legal issues when they signed exclusive contracts), etc...

In [[MusicBrainz]], we refer to such monikers as [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s, as opposed to [[Legal Name|LegalName]]s. Note that neither [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s nor [[Legal Name|LegalName]]s apply to groups (but see below for information about groups changing their name).


==Style for persons==
==Style for persons==
Line 17: Line 9:
===So, what name should I use for a musician: performance or legal name?===
===So, what name should I use for a musician: performance or legal name?===


The simple answer is: [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]] - when entering a new release into the database, you should just use whatever name is credited as the [[Primary Artist|PrimaryArtist]].
The simple answer is: performance name - when entering a new release into the database, you should just use whatever name is credited as the [[Primary Artist|primary artist]].


In some cases obviously (if the artist is also performing under other [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s which already exist in the database), that indeed means creating a ''new distinct artist entry'' for the ''same person''.
In some cases obviously (if the artist is also performing under other performance names which already exist in the database), that indeed means creating a ''new distinct artist entry'' for the ''same person''.


===I just added a new (PerformanceName) artist to the database. Should I go ahead and create another entry for the LegalName as well?===
===I just added a new (performance name) artist to the database. Should I go ahead and create another entry for the LegalName as well?===


Usually, no - you may just add that information to the [[Artist Annotation|ArtistAnnotation]].
Usually, no - you may just add that information to the [[Artist Annotation|artist annotation]].


===What to do if a musician uses multiple different PerformanceNames on various different releases?===
===What to do if a musician uses multiple different performance names on various different releases?===


You should create one artist entry for each different [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]] - though, please read the section below about cases when it doesn't make sense to create such new entries.
You should create one artist entry for each different performance name - though, please read the section below about cases when it doesn't make sense to create such new entries.


===Should I also create artist entries for "other" nicknames?===
===Should I also create artist entries for "other" nicknames?===


[[MusicBrainz]] focuses mainly on documenting releases: if the nickname in question is not used on any release (but only by the artist relatives for example), then this is not relevant and you shouldn't create an artist entry for it (though you may add the detail to the [[Artist Annotation|ArtistAnnotation]]).
MusicBrainz focuses mainly on documenting releases: if the nickname in question is not used on any release (but only by the artist relatives for example), then this is not relevant and you shouldn't create an artist entry for it (though you may add the detail to the artist annotation).


===If a musician has multiple different performance names, how will these multiple entries be related?===
===If a musician has multiple different performance names, how will these multiple entries be related?===


Various different [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s for a given artist may be related using a [[Performance Name Relationship Type|PerformanceNameRelationshipType]]. As to avoid making circular relations and other linking nightmare (see [[Don't Make Relationship Clusters|DontMakeRelationshipClusters]]), we relate all [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s to the artist [[Legal Name|LegalName]], instead of linking each [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]] to each other.
Various different performance names for a given artist may be related using a [[Performance Name Relationship Type|performance name relationship]]. As to avoid making circular relations and other linking nightmare (see [[Style/Relationships/Do not cluster|Don't make relationship clusters]]), we relate all performance names to the artist legal name, instead of linking each performance name to each other.


Specifically, this is where [[Legal Name|LegalName]]s are useful, and you may now create a new artist entry using the artist [[Legal Name|LegalName]] as a name, then relate all the artist's [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s to this new entry.
Specifically, this is where legal names are useful, and you may now create a new artist entry using the artist legal name as a name, then relate all the artist's performance names to this new entry.


===But, what to do if the musician had multiple different LegalNames?===
===But, what if the musician had multiple different legal names?===


The concept of [[Legal Name|LegalName]] itself is a quite debated one, and this was the subject of many discussions and various suggestions. Our policy at that time is simple: use only one [[Legal Name|LegalName]] for the artist (pick the birth name, usually found on birth certificates). If no one knows for sure, just pick the most probable one, and write an annotation mentioning all that.
The concept of legal name itself is a quite debated one, and this was the subject of many discussions and various suggestions. Our policy at that time is simple: use only one legal name for the artist (pick the birth name, usually found on birth certificates). If no one knows for sure, just pick the most probable one, and write an annotation mentioning all that.


===But still, what if a musician changes their LegalName, and performs under that new name?===
===But still, what if a musician changes their legal name, and performs under that new name?===


This new name by all means is ''also'' a [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]], and should be related like a [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]] to the artist [[Legal Name|LegalName]] already holding the other [[Performance Name Relationship Type|PerformanceNameRelationshipType]]s (eg: the birth name in most cases).
This new name by all means is ''also'' a performance name, and should be related like a performance name to the artist legal name already holding the other performance name relationships (eg: the birth name in most cases).


Remember that [[MusicBrainz]] doesn't try to qualify, or pass judgment, on the (possibly political, or very personal) reasons that may lead a person to change their name. We are focused on recording accurately the artist names as advertised on musical releases (eg: [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s), and the introduction of a [[Legal Name|LegalName]] is only a convenient way to describe relations between the various monikers an artist may use during his life (whatever the reason).
Remember that MusicBrainz doesn't try to qualify, or pass judgment, on the (possibly political, or very personal) reasons that may lead a person to change their name. We are focused on recording accurately the artist names as advertised on musical releases (eg: performance names), and the introduction of a legal name is only a convenient way to describe relations between the various monikers an artist may use during his life (whatever the reason).


===Does it always make sense to create distinct entries?===
===Does it always make sense to create distinct entries?===


No. In a lot of cases, the name variation (either between different [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s, or between the [[Legal Name|LegalName]] and a given [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]) is minor enough to make the splitting not worth the effort. In such cases, you should not create distinct entries (you may still use the [[Artist Annotation|ArtistAnnotation]] to provide additional details, and possibly use [[Artist Alias|ArtistAlias]]es to enhance search results).
No. In a lot of cases, the name variation (either between different performance names, or between the legal name and a given performance name) is minor enough to make the splitting not worth the effort. In such cases, you should not create distinct entries (you may still use the artist annotation to provide additional details, and possibly use [[Artist Alias|artist alias]] to enhance search results).


A few examples of when there is little benefit in creating distinct artist entries:
A few examples of when there is little benefit in creating distinct artist entries:
* common use abbreviations for first names (Robert Marley vs [[Artist:ed2ac1e9-d51d-4eff-a2c2-85e81abd6360|Bob Marley]])
* common use abbreviations for first names (Robert Marley vs [[Artist:ed2ac1e9-d51d-4eff-a2c2-85e81abd6360|Bob Marley]])
* first names shortened to initials (Katie Tunstall vs [[Artist:951d2103-9c7d-4849-ae60-88bf6aa4790b|K.T. Tunstall]])
* first names shortened to initials (Katie Tunstall vs [[Artist:951d2103-9c7d-4849-ae60-88bf6aa4790b|K.T. Tunstall]])
* middle names added/omitted (Elvin Ray Jones vs [[Artist:d5ac66e4-ea5d-4ebb-9e0d-bed4063208e7|Elvin Jones]])
* middle names added/omitted (Elvin Ray Jones vs [[Artist:d5ac66e4-ea5d-4ebb-9e0d-bed4063208e7|Elvin Jones]])
* additional nicknames just used once or twice (''"Baron" Charles Mingus'' vs [[Artist:f3b8e107-abe8-4743-b6a3-4a4ee995e71f|Charles Mingus]])
* additional nicknames just used once or twice (''"Baron" Charles Mingus'' vs [[Artist:f3b8e107-abe8-4743-b6a3-4a4ee995e71f|Charles Mingus]])
* nicknames used most of the time (Johnny Watson vs [[Artist:defba3df-b0f3-4ef1-8e1f-4ef88cc8fc42|Johnny "Guitar" Watson]])
* nicknames used most of the time (Johnny Watson vs [[Artist:defba3df-b0f3-4ef1-8e1f-4ef88cc8fc42|Johnny "Guitar" Watson]])


Remember, though, that [[Artist Intent|ArtistIntent]] may come into play - and some artists may put a lot of meaning into a minor name variation. Ultimately, reasonable judgment, common sense and knowledge about the artist production should prevail in choosing which name differences are significant or not.
Remember, though, that [[Artist Intent|artist intent]] may come into play - and some artists may put a lot of meaning into a minor name variation. Ultimately, reasonable judgment, common sense and knowledge about the artist production should prevail in choosing which name differences are significant or not.


===Should I duplicate the artist birth and death dates between the Legal and Performance names?===
===Should I duplicate the artist birth and death dates between the legal and performance names?===


Yes, you may add birth and death dates to both the Legal and Performance names.
Yes, you may add birth and death dates to both the legal and performance names.


===What about personal relationships? Should I duplicate them as well?===
===What about personal relationships? Should I duplicate them as well?===


No, [[:Category:Personal Association Relationship Class|Personal Association Relationship Class]] should not be duplicated, and you should favor using the [[Legal Name|LegalName]] to hold them.
No, [[:Category:Personal Association Relationship Class|personal association relationships]] should not be duplicated, and you should favor using the legal name to hold them.


==Examples==
===Examples===


* [[Artist:4d3924ac-7dc4-4632-9058-553119d6b951|Declan Patrick MacManus]] is the legal name of [[Artist:8a338e06-d182-46f2-bd16-30a09bc840ba|Elvis Costello]].
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">[[Artist:4d3924ac-7dc4-4632-9058-553119d6b951|Declan Patrick MacManus]] is the Legal Name of [[Artist:8a338e06-d182-46f2-bd16-30a09bc840ba|Elvis Costello]]. [[Artist:ce8cbced-8719-47b9-b728-6024e8b19b15|Abbey Lincoln]] is a performance name for the person Anna Marie Wooldridge (who later changed her legal name to Animata Moseka). Though, as she only performs as ''Abbey Lincoln'', only this entry was created in the database. [[Artist:f22942a1-6f70-4f48-866e-238cb2308fbd|Aphex Twin]], [[Artist:87225a21-c925-41cd-852f-be4b052d0824|AFX]] and [[Artist:bc1fd2f7-1ecf-46d1-9ca6-47b7d7880c4d|Caustic Window]] are all Performance Names of [[Artist:79a09151-f6cc-48f9-9907-3fdd0b68373f|Richard David James]].
* [[Artist:ce8cbced-8719-47b9-b728-6024e8b19b15|Abbey Lincoln]] is a performance name for the person Anna Marie Wooldridge (who later changed her legal name to Animata Moseka). Though, as she only performs as ''Abbey Lincoln'', only this entry was created in the database.
</ul>
* [[Artist:f22942a1-6f70-4f48-866e-238cb2308fbd|Aphex Twin]], [[Artist:87225a21-c925-41cd-852f-be4b052d0824|AFX]] and [[Artist:bc1fd2f7-1ecf-46d1-9ca6-47b7d7880c4d|Caustic Window]] are all performance names of [[Artist:79a09151-f6cc-48f9-9907-3fdd0b68373f|Richard David James]].


==Style for groups==
==Style for groups==


Note that neither performance names nor legal names apply to groups, the relationship between two groups is indicated by their common [[Member Of Band Relationship Type|membership]] - although any relevant details can still be added to their [[Annotation|annotation]]s.
Groups don't have neither [[Legal Name|LegalName]]s nor [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]]s.



If a group goes by '''different names''' to cover '''different projects''', they should be separate entries in the database.
If a group changes its name on its own, it's considered to be a new group, and the relationship between them is indicated by their common membership ([[Member Of Band Relationship Type|MemberOfBandRelationshipType]]) - you may obviously add any relevant details to the [[Artist Annotation|ArtistAnnotation]] for that group.
;Examples
* [[artist:6fd6ee3f-6ff3-4727-8474-2409e0190dc0|La Puta Opepé]] are known as [[artist:4b1af9d6-b714-4048-9e8a-342e43140a4f|Raggaflá]] for reggae/dancehall music.


===Groups changing their name due to legal issues===


If a group goes by '''different names at the same time''', using the names in an '''interchangeable manner''', it depends on the extent of the changes. Minor variations or localised names should usually be one entry, the artist credit can be used to handle the variation, and each variation can also be added as an alias. For larger variations, it may be better to consider them separate entries. What counts as a minor change varies from artist to artist, some artists may put a lot of meaning into what would normally be considered very minor changes.
On the other hand, a group that is forced to change its name for legal reasons (trademark issues, in most cases) usually is not duplicated: their name should be changed into the new one and the old one should be added as an [[Artist Alias|ArtistAlias]].
;Examples
* [[artist:4a4ee089-93b1-4470-af9a-6ff575d32704|The Prodigy]] have some releases credited to "Prodigy".
* [[artist:a0909969-764a-4ba7-846a-3c34f697e755|少年ナイフ]] are credited as "Shonen Knife" on their American releases.


Examples:
* [[Artist:7bd63c22-5496-4e14-9341-98cbea99b904|superzwei]] - they had to change their name from nimmzwei to superzwei in 2003
* [[Artist:4cf53152-5ab5-42ca-ac0d-dfcf8bc48f46|Karat]] - they had to call itself K...! for nearly one year between 2006 and 2007


If a group '''changes its name''' and then '''continues to use that name''', as above, this depends mainly on the extent of the change. If it is only a fairly minor change, it is fine to simply update the current entry and use aliases and artist credits for the variations. If it is a larger change, it is usually considered a new group. Again, what counts as a minor change varies from artist to artist.
===Advanced information===
;Examples
* [[artist:b9472588-93f3-4922-a1a2-74082cdf9ce8|Panic! at the Disco]] were known as "Panic at the Disco" for a period of time.
* [[artist:db6107e1-f692-453a-ab0e-4566faaba298|La Ruda]] were originally known as "La Ruda Salska".
* [[artist:7c20f558-d664-42bd-b6f1-81acf9dbb72d|t.A.T.u.]] were originally known as "Тату" in Russia. They now use "t.A.T.u." everywhere.


Groups changing their name is not an easy topic. Mainly, this falls into the following categories:
* a given group goes by '''different names at the same time''', to cover '''very different projects''': you should use different entries in the database
* a given group goes by '''different names at the same time''', using the names in an interchangeable manner: if the names are really different, you should create different entries. On the other hand, if the names are reasonably similar (omitted/added definite article, slight spelling alterations, random additions to the main name), it's quite tolerable to just use one artist entry for it. Remember that, just like for persons, it's mainly a matter of finding the right balance between accuracy and not making the database unusable due to counter-productive splitting. Be wise! :-)
* a given group '''changes its name at some point in time''': just as above, this depends mainly on the extent of the change. When the group [[Artist:db6107e1-f692-453a-ab0e-4566faaba298|La Ruda Salska]] changed its name to simply [[Artist:db6107e1-f692-453a-ab0e-4566faaba298|La Ruda]], the artist subscribers deemed that such a change didn't deserve the creation of a new artist entry. Hence they renamed the artist entry, created an [[Artist Alias|ArtistAlias]], and wrote an annotation about that. Again, [[Artist Intent|ArtistIntent]] is important - and good knowledge about the artist will help you in making the right decision.


If a group is forced to '''change its name for legal reasons''' (trademark issues, in most cases), it should usually be a single entry. The name used depends whether the group changed their name completely or only for certain countries:
==History, advanced readings==
* If the group changes their name completely, the group's name should be their new name with the old name as an alias. Releases prior to the change have the old name in the artist credit.
* If the group only change their name for certain countries, the old name should be kept and the new name added as an alias. Releases in those countries should have the new name in the artist credit.
;Examples
* [[artist:7bd63c22-5496-4e14-9341-98cbea99b904|superzwei]] had to change their name from "nimmzwei" to "superzwei" in 2003.
* [[artist:4cf53152-5ab5-42ca-ac0d-dfcf8bc48f46|Karat]] had to use "K...!" from 2006 to 2007.
* [[artist:42922db2-2e80-44b8-9cdf-0b3a6634c124|Yazoo]] are known as "Yaz" in the USA after a lawsuit from another American artist called Yazoo.
* [[artist:a55c2f1b-3f3f-4d6a-aa30-5e186dbadce6|Suede]] are known as "The London Suede" in the USA after a lawsuit from another American artist called [[artist:afcca32f-c202-4f18-8951-af79d483791a|Suede]].


[[Category:WikiDocs Page]]
There were for a long time a number of issues surrounding these problems. If you're interested in the various discussions and solutions that were raised, you may take a look at [[Date Of Birth Style|DateOfBirthStyle]] and [[Linking Different Artist Names|LinkingDifferentArtistNames]].
[[Category:Advanced Relationship]][[Category:WikiDocs Page]]

Revision as of 05:43, 19 May 2011

Status: This is an official style guideline.

Some musicians perform using an "alias" (not to be confused with the MusicBrainz term, "artist alias") which is different from their "real-life" name. The reasons for that vary - usually marketing, or to hide their actual identity (as to workaround legal issues when they signed exclusive contracts), etc...

In MusicBrainz, we refer to such monikers as performance names, as opposed to legal names.

Style for persons

So, what name should I use for a musician: performance or legal name?

The simple answer is: performance name - when entering a new release into the database, you should just use whatever name is credited as the primary artist.

In some cases obviously (if the artist is also performing under other performance names which already exist in the database), that indeed means creating a new distinct artist entry for the same person.

I just added a new (performance name) artist to the database. Should I go ahead and create another entry for the LegalName as well?

Usually, no - you may just add that information to the artist annotation.

What to do if a musician uses multiple different performance names on various different releases?

You should create one artist entry for each different performance name - though, please read the section below about cases when it doesn't make sense to create such new entries.

Should I also create artist entries for "other" nicknames?

MusicBrainz focuses mainly on documenting releases: if the nickname in question is not used on any release (but only by the artist relatives for example), then this is not relevant and you shouldn't create an artist entry for it (though you may add the detail to the artist annotation).

If a musician has multiple different performance names, how will these multiple entries be related?

Various different performance names for a given artist may be related using a performance name relationship. As to avoid making circular relations and other linking nightmare (see Don't make relationship clusters), we relate all performance names to the artist legal name, instead of linking each performance name to each other.

Specifically, this is where legal names are useful, and you may now create a new artist entry using the artist legal name as a name, then relate all the artist's performance names to this new entry.

But, what if the musician had multiple different legal names?

The concept of legal name itself is a quite debated one, and this was the subject of many discussions and various suggestions. Our policy at that time is simple: use only one legal name for the artist (pick the birth name, usually found on birth certificates). If no one knows for sure, just pick the most probable one, and write an annotation mentioning all that.

But still, what if a musician changes their legal name, and performs under that new name?

This new name by all means is also a performance name, and should be related like a performance name to the artist legal name already holding the other performance name relationships (eg: the birth name in most cases).

Remember that MusicBrainz doesn't try to qualify, or pass judgment, on the (possibly political, or very personal) reasons that may lead a person to change their name. We are focused on recording accurately the artist names as advertised on musical releases (eg: performance names), and the introduction of a legal name is only a convenient way to describe relations between the various monikers an artist may use during his life (whatever the reason).

Does it always make sense to create distinct entries?

No. In a lot of cases, the name variation (either between different performance names, or between the legal name and a given performance name) is minor enough to make the splitting not worth the effort. In such cases, you should not create distinct entries (you may still use the artist annotation to provide additional details, and possibly use artist alias to enhance search results).

A few examples of when there is little benefit in creating distinct artist entries:

  • common use abbreviations for first names (Robert Marley vs Bob Marley)
  • first names shortened to initials (Katie Tunstall vs K.T. Tunstall)
  • middle names added/omitted (Elvin Ray Jones vs Elvin Jones)
  • additional nicknames just used once or twice ("Baron" Charles Mingus vs Charles Mingus)
  • nicknames used most of the time (Johnny Watson vs Johnny "Guitar" Watson)

Remember, though, that artist intent may come into play - and some artists may put a lot of meaning into a minor name variation. Ultimately, reasonable judgment, common sense and knowledge about the artist production should prevail in choosing which name differences are significant or not.

Should I duplicate the artist birth and death dates between the legal and performance names?

Yes, you may add birth and death dates to both the legal and performance names.

What about personal relationships? Should I duplicate them as well?

No, personal association relationships should not be duplicated, and you should favor using the legal name to hold them.

Examples

Style for groups

Note that neither performance names nor legal names apply to groups, the relationship between two groups is indicated by their common membership - although any relevant details can still be added to their annotations.


If a group goes by different names to cover different projects, they should be separate entries in the database.

Examples


If a group goes by different names at the same time, using the names in an interchangeable manner, it depends on the extent of the changes. Minor variations or localised names should usually be one entry, the artist credit can be used to handle the variation, and each variation can also be added as an alias. For larger variations, it may be better to consider them separate entries. What counts as a minor change varies from artist to artist, some artists may put a lot of meaning into what would normally be considered very minor changes.

Examples


If a group changes its name and then continues to use that name, as above, this depends mainly on the extent of the change. If it is only a fairly minor change, it is fine to simply update the current entry and use aliases and artist credits for the variations. If it is a larger change, it is usually considered a new group. Again, what counts as a minor change varies from artist to artist.

Examples
  • Panic! at the Disco were known as "Panic at the Disco" for a period of time.
  • La Ruda were originally known as "La Ruda Salska".
  • t.A.T.u. were originally known as "Тату" in Russia. They now use "t.A.T.u." everywhere.


If a group is forced to change its name for legal reasons (trademark issues, in most cases), it should usually be a single entry. The name used depends whether the group changed their name completely or only for certain countries:

  • If the group changes their name completely, the group's name should be their new name with the old name as an alias. Releases prior to the change have the old name in the artist credit.
  • If the group only change their name for certain countries, the old name should be kept and the new name added as an alias. Releases in those countries should have the new name in the artist credit.
Examples
  • superzwei had to change their name from "nimmzwei" to "superzwei" in 2003.
  • Karat had to use "K...!" from 2006 to 2007.
  • Yazoo are known as "Yaz" in the USA after a lawsuit from another American artist called Yazoo.
  • Suede are known as "The London Suede" in the USA after a lawsuit from another American artist called Suede.