Style/Relationships

From MusicBrainz Wiki
< Style
Revision as of 19:45, 7 September 2006 by Shepard (talk | contribs) (collection of general guidelines and discussing new ones (Imported from MoinMoin))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Guidelines for Using Advanced Relationships

This page outlines general guidelines that should be followed when adding AdvancedRelationships in order to have the database consistent and lists guidelines which are discussed and need yet to be agreed on.

Agreed On Guidelines

Note that most of the guidelines for AdvancedRelationships are kept in the style sections of the appropriate relationship types (or even have their own pages), so this should only be used for general guidelines.

For some general guidelines (or those which affect several relationship types) with their own pages, see:

Discussing Guidelines

Some of those can probably be moved to the style section of the appropriate relationship type when agreed on instead of beeing listed in the section above.

Re-releases of covers

Tracks which are re-releases of a cover-version of a song should not have relationships of the CoverRelationshipType to the earliest release of the original version. Instead only the earliest release of the cover-version should link to the earliest release of the original version and all re-releases of the cover-version should be linked to their earliest release with the SameTrackRelationshipType.

Cover medleys

If an artist performs a medley of songs they didn't originally wrote, that is the medley is a bunch of covers, then should the original versions be linked with the MedleyRelationshipType or with the CoverRelationshipType?

Linking artists to all or only original releases?

Should artists that worked on a release/track only be linked to the original/regular release of it or to all of them? The answer to that can pretty much depend on the relationship type and if it's a track or a release. For featuring performers we currently encourage the users to link to all tracks. With releases it seems people mostly add credits from the liner notes if they own it, and the release they own doesn't have to be the original/regular release. Also it's not always possible to identify an original/regular release (see the EU release and the US release of this album for example). For composers and lyrics writers there seems to be agreement not to link them to re-releases/later versions.

Track/release crediting

If an artist is credited for a certain range of tracks on a release only, should that credit be allowed to be linked to the whole release too? Or should links to whole releases imply that the artist worked on all tracks? In other words: what justifies a link from an artist to a release:

  • work on one track
  • work on a majority of tracks
  • work on all tracks without an exception?

Should we follow the style in the liner notes or only a general principle? For example: if lyrics writers and composers are listed for all tracks but the lyrics writer is always the same, then should we still link them to the tracks only? What if all tracks have the lyrics written by artist X except one which has them written by artist X and artist Y?

Line-up linking

Should the whole line-up for a release be linked or only session/guest musicians because the regular band members are already linked to the band? Of course this not always redundant, an artist can be member of a band but not perform on an album for whatever reasons.

Are session artists, which are not considered part of the band, always guest musicians? Or should the GuestRelationshipAttribute only be used when the liner notes call them guest musicians? Or can we perhaps work out our own definition for this attribute?