Talk:About/Press: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (New page: I'm not done with this page, I'll go through the rest of the page tomorrow. --~~~~)
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm not done with this page, I'll go through the rest of the page tomorrow. --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 12:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
What should be done with broken links? Some of these links are extremely old and in some cases the domain doesn't exist anymore. --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 03:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
:Are they available through archive.org? [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
::Great idea, looks like at least one is. I'll go through the rest soon. --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 08:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


Here are the only three that I couldn't find through archive.org, they're among the last few under 'News stories and articles'. What would you suggest? --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 04:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

== Broken links ==
'''2001-05-17''': MusicBrainz is covered in a [http://news.webnoize.com/item.rs?eID=20010517&ID=13101 WebNoize article about Roxio and GraceNote]. (''requires a Webnoize subscription'')
:http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.
'''2001-05-02''': The [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36259-2001May2.html Napster/Relatable deal gets covered by the Washington Post] and includes a blurb about MusicBrainz.
:This link is broken, I searched and found [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72376418.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+3,+2001&author=David+Segal&desc=Song-Swap+Stopper;+An+Alexandria+Programmer's+Software+May+Be+the+Key+to+Napster's+Survival this] but it's only a preview not the entire article and the preview doesn't mention MusicBrainz. Archive.org wasn't allowed to archive it.
'''2001-04-19''': MusicBrainz is mentioned in a [http://news.webnoize.com/item.rs?ID=12681 WebNoize article on the Relatable/Napster deal]. (''requires Webnoize subscription'')
:http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.

Latest revision as of 05:43, 22 April 2012

What should be done with broken links? Some of these links are extremely old and in some cases the domain doesn't exist anymore. --navap 03:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Are they available through archive.org? Murdos 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Great idea, looks like at least one is. I'll go through the rest soon. --navap 08:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


Here are the only three that I couldn't find through archive.org, they're among the last few under 'News stories and articles'. What would you suggest? --navap 04:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Broken links

2001-05-17: MusicBrainz is covered in a WebNoize article about Roxio and GraceNote. (requires a Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.

2001-05-02: The Napster/Relatable deal gets covered by the Washington Post and includes a blurb about MusicBrainz.

This link is broken, I searched and found this but it's only a preview not the entire article and the preview doesn't mention MusicBrainz. Archive.org wasn't allowed to archive it.

2001-04-19: MusicBrainz is mentioned in a WebNoize article on the Relatable/Napster deal. (requires Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.