Talk:About/Press: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:MusicBrainz Press moved to History talk:MusicBrainz Press over redirect: God said it was the thing to do)
(No difference)

Revision as of 20:49, 31 October 2011

What should be done with broken links? Some of these links are extremely old and in some cases the domain doesn't exist anymore. --navap 03:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Are they available through archive.org? Murdos 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Great idea, looks like at least one is. I'll go through the rest soon. --navap 08:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


Here are the only three that I couldn't find through archive.org, they're among the last few under 'News stories and articles'. What would you suggest? --navap 04:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Broken links

2001-05-17: MusicBrainz is covered in a WebNoize article about Roxio and GraceNote. (requires a Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.

2001-05-02: The Napster/Relatable deal gets covered by the Washington Post and includes a blurb about MusicBrainz.

This link is broken, I searched and found this but it's only a preview not the entire article and the preview doesn't mention MusicBrainz. Archive.org wasn't allowed to archive it.

2001-04-19: MusicBrainz is mentioned in a WebNoize article on the Relatable/Napster deal. (requires Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.