Talk:About/Press

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Revision as of 05:43, 22 April 2012 by PavanChander (talk | contribs) (Talk:About MusicBrainz/Press moved to Talk:About/Press)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

What should be done with broken links? Some of these links are extremely old and in some cases the domain doesn't exist anymore. --navap 03:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Are they available through archive.org? Murdos 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Great idea, looks like at least one is. I'll go through the rest soon. --navap 08:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


Here are the only three that I couldn't find through archive.org, they're among the last few under 'News stories and articles'. What would you suggest? --navap 04:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Broken links

2001-05-17: MusicBrainz is covered in a WebNoize article about Roxio and GraceNote. (requires a Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.

2001-05-02: The Napster/Relatable deal gets covered by the Washington Post and includes a blurb about MusicBrainz.

This link is broken, I searched and found this but it's only a preview not the entire article and the preview doesn't mention MusicBrainz. Archive.org wasn't allowed to archive it.

2001-04-19: MusicBrainz is mentioned in a WebNoize article on the Relatable/Napster deal. (requires Webnoize subscription)

http://webnoiz.com seems to be down and archive.org was not allowed to archive it.