Talk:Arranger Relationship Type

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Revision as of 16:53, 21 March 2009 by Nikki (talk | contribs) (New page: Where should transcription go? --ClutchEr2 How should one note that someone arranged vocals (perhaps only a specific kind of vocals) on a track/release? --[[User:Frede...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Where should transcription go? --ClutchEr2

How should one note that someone arranged vocals (perhaps only a specific kind of vocals) on a track/release? --FrederikSOlesen

"vocal"

With the VocalRelationshipAttribute you can specify for which vocal the person did the arrangement.

I suggest that vocal arrangement arrangement should be documentated as per above, and be work completely analogous to the instrumental arrangement, i.e. arrangement of any vocal in the vocal tree can be specified. -- foolip 15:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey dudes. How would I AR "Co-arranged by DJ T-bone" as credited on [[[Image:dscf1617yn6.jpg]] Track 12]? In lack of a "Co-" attribute that other ARs have I was thinking of using the only other (relevant-ish?) attribute, "additional", but then the wiki does helpfully (:p) state that no guidelines exist for that. -- TimeDilation

  • I would use the additional attribute as it normally implies a secondary role. The 'co-' attribute of the producer (and others?) AR is sort of special because a "co-producer" has certain connotations beyond "the other producer" or "the secondary producer". I'm not sure if "co-arranged by" has the same connotations. -- Gecks