Talk:Biography Relationship Type: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (New page: If the web-page includes a specifically open-content license, then users should be encouraged to note this information in MusicBrainz, possibly with a relationship attribute? Should ...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Open Issues ===
If the web-page includes a specifically open-content license, then users should be encouraged to note this information in [[MusicBrainz]], possibly with a relationship attribute?
The link phrase says "''the'' biography" instead of "''a'' biography". Is this implying that there should only be one?
* Afaik, not the intention of the AR; there's a few like this, which I'll be RFCing to fix. [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 14:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)


=== Closed Issues ===
Should we use [[Date Relationship Attribute|DateRelationshipAttribute]] here to record what period the biography covers? How about using the end date to record when the biography was last updated?


If the web-page includes a specifically open-content license, then users should be encouraged to note this information in [[MusicBrainz]], possibly with a relationship attribute?
The link phrase says "''the'' biography" instead of "''a'' biography". Is this implying that there should only be one?
* The AR Class specifies that open-content isn't required; any suggestion for a change in either requiring it, or noting it for this AR, should be [[Proposals|proposed]] if you think it's needed. [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 14:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Should we use [[Date Relationship Attribute]] here to record what period the biography covers? How about using the end date to record when the biography was last updated?
* Not really possible here; URL ARs don't have [[Date Relationship Attribute]] support. [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 14:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:49, 20 March 2010

Open Issues

The link phrase says "the biography" instead of "a biography". Is this implying that there should only be one?

  • Afaik, not the intention of the AR; there's a few like this, which I'll be RFCing to fix. BrianSchweitzer 14:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Closed Issues

If the web-page includes a specifically open-content license, then users should be encouraged to note this information in MusicBrainz, possibly with a relationship attribute?

  • The AR Class specifies that open-content isn't required; any suggestion for a change in either requiring it, or noting it for this AR, should be proposed if you think it's needed. BrianSchweitzer 14:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Should we use Date Relationship Attribute here to record what period the biography covers? How about using the end date to record when the biography was last updated?