Talk:Blog Relationship Type: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Can this be used to link to pay sites (for example, sites you need to sign-up for a fee)? I'm against them, but strictly speaking those can be added as per the current guidelines. As an ex...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can this be used to link to pay sites (for example, sites you need to sign-up for a fee)? I'm against them, but strictly speaking those can be added as per the current guidelines. As an example, see edit #12719275 |
Can this be used to link to pay sites (for example, sites you need to sign-up for a fee)? I'm against them, but strictly speaking those can be added as per the current guidelines. As an example, see edit #12719275 --[[User:ChurruKa|ChurruKa]] 12:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
Also, it should be clearly stated if this relationship is exclusive for "official" blogs or not (I think it should be, but the description "his relationship type is used to link to the blog for an entity" does allow linking a fan-made blog about an artist) [[User:ChurruKa|ChurruKa]] 12:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 19 June 2010
Can this be used to link to pay sites (for example, sites you need to sign-up for a fee)? I'm against them, but strictly speaking those can be added as per the current guidelines. As an example, see edit #12719275 --ChurruKa 12:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Also, it should be clearly stated if this relationship is exclusive for "official" blogs or not (I think it should be, but the description "his relationship type is used to link to the blog for an entity" does allow linking a fan-made blog about an artist) ChurruKa 12:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
