Talk:Collaboration Relationship Type: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (New page: * There's a big open discussion about how best to represent artistic collaborations: see the discussion section under FeaturingArtistStyle. * Are we supposed to...) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 19:15, 15 March 2009
- There's a big open discussion about how best to represent artistic collaborations: see the discussion section under FeaturingArtistStyle.
- Are we supposed to use the DateRelationshipAttribute with collaborations? It seems to me that collaborations can almost be defined to be so brief that these attributes are irrelevant. If people start using DateRelationshipAttribute, then the link phrase "was a collaboration between <x>" won't make sense, because "<x>" will be just one person. --MatthewExon
- In a similar way to MemberOfBandRelationshipType, it might be nice to specify what role an artist played in the collaboration, possibly by setting the InstrumentRelationshipAttribute.
