Talk:Editing FAQ: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Just copying an IRChat, without formatting, is hardly useful) |
(Some wikification; start →You are not currently able to add notes to this edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Merging releases == |
|||
The editing FAQ says releases should be merged if: |
The editing FAQ says releases should be merged if: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== You are not currently able to add notes to this edit == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Considering my inbox, I assume that message means that (?almost?) noone may add notes until ''radant'' (and other spambots) can't spam for www.SPAM.bigmoncler.SPAM.example.com (and other scammers) anymore. --[[User:Erik Warmelink|Erik Warmelink]] 21:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:07, 14 December 2011
Merging releases
The editing FAQ says releases should be merged if:
- the number of tracks is the same
- the track titles are the same
- track lengths within 2 secs
What about barcodes, publisher, packaging, release date, and format?
- At this place was an unformatted copy from a freenode chat, see http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/?title=Talk:Editing_FAQ&oldid=46170 --Erik Warmelink 21:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
You are not currently able to add notes to this edit
Considering my inbox, I assume that message means that (?almost?) noone may add notes until radant (and other spambots) can't spam for www.SPAM.bigmoncler.SPAM.example.com (and other scammers) anymore. --Erik Warmelink 21:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
