Talk:Label: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Imported from MoinMoin)) |
(@Gecks: collab label (Imported from MoinMoin)) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* At that time, there are no known cases of two or more "collaborating" labels jointly issuing a release (please don't confuse this with distributors/holding mentioned on sleeves), so there should theoretically be no need for rules regarding collaborations. |
* At that time, there are no known cases of two or more "collaborating" labels jointly issuing a release (please don't confuse this with distributors/holding mentioned on sleeves), so there should theoretically be no need for rules regarding collaborations. |
||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I know of a few examples of this - eg, [http://www.discogs.com/release/529682 http://www.discogs.com/release/529682] (happens a LOT with split releases). -- [[User:Gecks|Gecks]] |
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">I know of a few examples of this - eg, [http://www.discogs.com/release/529682 http://www.discogs.com/release/529682] (happens a LOT with split releases). -- [[User:Gecks|Gecks]] |
||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Ok... I'm too conservative for such stuff :p - please go ahead and add thoughts about it: do we want "collabs"? ampersand versus "and"? new AR needed? etc, -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 11:53, 05 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
</ul> |
|||
</ul> |
</ul> |
||
* The last point (4) of [[Label Sort Name|LabelSortName]] style may be discussed, and one may argue that some label can use the name of their founder, and that such names may follow the usual artist [[Sortname Style|SortNameStyle]]. I don't think so, and I would like to see concrete examples before taking decision and add additional sorting rules. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 18:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
* The last point (4) of [[Label Sort Name|LabelSortName]] style may be discussed, and one may argue that some label can use the name of their founder, and that such names may follow the usual artist [[Sortname Style|SortNameStyle]]. I don't think so, and I would like to see concrete examples before taking decision and add additional sorting rules. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 18:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 11:53, 5 April 2007
Discussion about labels
- At that time, there are no known cases of two or more "collaborating" labels jointly issuing a release (please don't confuse this with distributors/holding mentioned on sleeves), so there should theoretically be no need for rules regarding collaborations.
- I know of a few examples of this - eg, http://www.discogs.com/release/529682 (happens a LOT with split releases). -- Gecks
- Ok... I'm too conservative for such stuff :p - please go ahead and add thoughts about it: do we want "collabs"? ampersand versus "and"? new AR needed? etc, -- dmppanda 11:53, 05 April 2007 (UTC)
- The last point (4) of LabelSortName style may be discussed, and one may argue that some label can use the name of their founder, and that such names may follow the usual artist SortNameStyle. I don't think so, and I would like to see concrete examples before taking decision and add additional sorting rules. -- dmppanda 18:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Eg, "David Geffen Company", though to be honest as this is a trademarked company name, I don't think re-arranging it would be right. I imagine this is true with all other examples. -- Gecks
