Talk:Release Event Style: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (New page: <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">ReleaseDate is mandatory? What if they don't know it? --Gecks What about ''official'' vs ''real'' [[Release Date|Releas...) |
(removed question about mandatory release date) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none"> |
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">What about ''official'' vs ''real'' [[Release Date]]? It seems that ''... when a [[Release]] is first sold on a market...'' means, that the earliest date of a sale should be entered (''real''), not some announced release date (''official''). I always thought that the dates have to be official release dates, but after reading this page, I have doubts. --[[User:r@zorbla.de|r@zorbla.de]] |
||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">It probably should be rephrased then, as i think generally it's only going to be the 'official' date that's useful in a discography, and i'm pretty sure that's the what the practice is anyway. --[[User:Gecks|Gecks]] |
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">It probably should be rephrased then, as i think generally it's only going to be the 'official' date that's useful in a discography, and i'm pretty sure that's the what the practice is anyway. --[[User:Gecks|Gecks]] |
||
</ul> |
</ul> |
||
Latest revision as of 14:44, 14 September 2009
- What about official vs real Release Date? It seems that ... when a Release is first sold on a market... means, that the earliest date of a sale should be entered (real), not some announced release date (official). I always thought that the dates have to be official release dates, but after reading this page, I have doubts. --r@zorbla.de
- It probably should be rephrased then, as i think generally it's only going to be the 'official' date that's useful in a discography, and i'm pretty sure that's the what the practice is anyway. --Gecks
