Talk:Style/Unknown and untitled/Special purpose label: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Imported from MoinMoin))
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">[no label] has grown out of control as far as I can tell. I would suggest we come back to the former idea about it, and splits it up into different specialized entries (web release, auto release, white label), and keep the main no label entry as a dump zone. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 09:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">[no label] has grown out of control as far as I can tell. I would suggest we come back to the former idea about it, and splits it up into different specialized entries (web release, auto release, white label), and keep the main no label entry as a dump zone. -- [[User:dmppanda|dmppanda]] 09:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
</ul>
</ul>

== [unknown] ==

Why not in code change "[unknown]" to blank when it is entered in the release details? [[User:202.124.109.9|202.124.109.9]] 10:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:58, 19 May 2011

What about web-only downloads? Should we use [no label] there too? --Zout

  • [no label] has grown out of control as far as I can tell. I would suggest we come back to the former idea about it, and splits it up into different specialized entries (web release, auto release, white label), and keep the main no label entry as a dump zone. -- dmppanda 09:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

[unknown]

Why not in code change "[unknown]" to blank when it is entered in the release details? 202.124.109.9 10:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)