User:Azertus/Potential IMDb Relationship Type Problem

From MusicBrainz Wiki
< User:Azertus
Revision as of 14:42, 24 May 2011 by Azertus (talk | contribs) (copy from User:Azertus)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

There's one between a soundtrack-IMDb (and ibdb & iobdb) and one between an album-IMDb (when containing samples from a movie; henceforth the soundtrack AR and the samples AR. I'm guessing the Artist-URL soundtrack AR and the Track-URL samples AR were no problem to convert. According to this table, the Album-URL ARs should have been converted/migrated as follows:

AR Type     Now         NGS         Comment     Status in migration scripts
IMDb, ibdb, iobdb Album-URL ReleaseGroup-URL ok OK
IMDb samples Album-URL Release-URL OK

Example soundtrack: Release-group 'Star Wars: A New Hope' is the soundtrack from 'Star Wars' http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/80fe84a4-b606-3491-a170-f2ca17501493/relationships

Example samples: Recording 'Release Me' contains samples from 'Independence Day'. http://musicbrainz.org/recording/170e12d4-cbe7-46a6-add9-b71958abaa60/relationships

The question is: is only the link name wrong, or have the soundtrack AR and the samples AR become the same?

Tangentially: we decided once that a track-URL soundtrack AR was not needed. However, would it not be useful? I note we did have (pre-NGS?; what happened to those? AnswerMe) a track-URL IBDb and IOBDb AR.