User:Azertus/Potential IMDb Relationship Type Problem

From MusicBrainz Wiki
< User:Azertus
Revision as of 14:42, 24 May 2011 by Azertus (talk | contribs) (copy from User:Azertus)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

There's one between a soundtrack-IMDb (and ibdb & iobdb) and one between an album-IMDb (when containing samples from a movie; henceforth the soundtrack AR and the samples AR. I'm guessing the Artist-URL soundtrack AR and the Track-URL samples AR were no problem to convert. According to this table, the Album-URL ARs should have been converted/migrated as follows:

AR Type     Now         NGS         Comment     Status in migration scripts
IMDb, ibdb, iobdb Album-URL ReleaseGroup-URL ok OK
IMDb samples Album-URL Release-URL OK

Example soundtrack: Release-group 'Star Wars: A New Hope' is the soundtrack from 'Star Wars' http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/80fe84a4-b606-3491-a170-f2ca17501493/relationships

Example samples: Recording 'Release Me' contains samples from 'Independence Day'. http://musicbrainz.org/recording/170e12d4-cbe7-46a6-add9-b71958abaa60/relationships

The question is: is only the link name wrong, or have the soundtrack AR and the samples AR become the same?

Tangentially: we decided once that a track-URL soundtrack AR was not needed. However, would it not be useful? I note we did have (pre-NGS?; what happened to those? AnswerMe) a track-URL IBDb and IOBDb AR.