Difference between revisions of "User:BrianSchweitzer/Conductor Position Relationship Type Proposal"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
(Moved to RFC-264a/266a)
Line 85: Line 85:
 
* A conductor must be a person [[Artist|artist]].
 
* A conductor must be a person [[Artist|artist]].
 
* The [[Artist|artist]] conducted by the conductor must be a group [[Artist|artist]].
 
* The [[Artist|artist]] conducted by the conductor must be a group [[Artist|artist]].
* A conductor is almost never also a [[Member Of Band Relationship Type|member]] of the group.
 
 
* Only one of the attributes 'assistant', 'associate', 'emeritus', or 'principal' should be used at the same time.
 
* Only one of the attributes 'assistant', 'associate', 'emeritus', or 'principal' should be used at the same time.
 
* If the [[WikiPedia:Conducting|conductor]] position specifically involves the training, leading, and/or conducting of a ''choir'' or ''chorus'', then while the action is still 'conducting', the more correct title is 'choirmaster', not 'conductor'.  [[Proposal:Choirmaster Position Relationship Type Proposal|Choirmaster Position Relationship Type]] should be used to describe this position, and ''not'' this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]].
 
* If the [[WikiPedia:Conducting|conductor]] position specifically involves the training, leading, and/or conducting of a ''choir'' or ''chorus'', then while the action is still 'conducting', the more correct title is 'choirmaster', not 'conductor'.  [[Proposal:Choirmaster Position Relationship Type Proposal|Choirmaster Position Relationship Type]] should be used to describe this position, and ''not'' this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]].

Revision as of 03:13, 17 December 2010


Status: This page describes an active advanced relationship proposal and is not official.



Proposal number: RFC-266
Champion: BrianFreud
Current status: Pre-RFC
Initial Discussion



Template:Relationship