User:BrianSchweitzer/Conductor Position Relationship Type Proposal: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(Moved to RFC-264a/266a) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
* A conductor must be a person [[Artist|artist]]. |
* A conductor must be a person [[Artist|artist]]. |
||
* The [[Artist|artist]] conducted by the conductor must be a group [[Artist|artist]]. |
* The [[Artist|artist]] conducted by the conductor must be a group [[Artist|artist]]. |
||
* A conductor is almost never also a [[Member Of Band Relationship Type|member]] of the group. |
|||
* Only one of the attributes 'assistant', 'associate', 'emeritus', or 'principal' should be used at the same time. |
* Only one of the attributes 'assistant', 'associate', 'emeritus', or 'principal' should be used at the same time. |
||
* If the [[WikiPedia:Conducting|conductor]] position specifically involves the training, leading, and/or conducting of a ''choir'' or ''chorus'', then while the action is still 'conducting', the more correct title is 'choirmaster', not 'conductor'. [[Proposal:Choirmaster Position Relationship Type Proposal|Choirmaster Position Relationship Type]] should be used to describe this position, and ''not'' this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]]. |
* If the [[WikiPedia:Conducting|conductor]] position specifically involves the training, leading, and/or conducting of a ''choir'' or ''chorus'', then while the action is still 'conducting', the more correct title is 'choirmaster', not 'conductor'. [[Proposal:Choirmaster Position Relationship Type Proposal|Choirmaster Position Relationship Type]] should be used to describe this position, and ''not'' this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]]. |
||
Revision as of 03:13, 17 December 2010
| Status: This page describes an active advanced relationship proposal and is not official. |
|
|
